TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @kripota4

@kripota4: statistics and cleanliness index

Криптач

Собираем самые интересные новости из мира крипты. Пишем про перспективные проекты. Иногда материмся.

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-26
Subscribers
693,612
Median views
1,517
ERR
0.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-09-26 — 12 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel's audience has practically stopped opening the feed: in a month and a half, more than 50 thousand people have unsubscribed, and posts are viewed by only a tiny fraction of subscribers.

With such dynamics, the reach forecast is unreliable, and the declared size of the audience base gives no indication of the actual number of ad impressions.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.2% with 693,612 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. There are subscribers, but almost no views.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 39 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 35 to 1,563,890 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 39 of 39
@kripota4 0.2%
similar channels median 16.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 24 of 37
@kripota4 0.7
similar channels median 1.11

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 20 to Sep 26. The dashed line is the median (1,517).

09511.9KSep 20: 1,425 viewsSep 21: 1,306 viewsSep 21: 1,277 viewsSep 21: 1,393 viewsSep 21: 1,371 viewsSep 21: 1,462 viewsSep 21: 1,679 viewsSep 21: 1,587 viewsSep 21: 1,465 viewsSep 21: 1,425 viewsSep 21: 1,570 viewsSep 21: 1,592 viewsSep 21: 1,530 viewsSep 21: 1,758 viewsSep 21: 1,733 viewsSep 21: 1,903 viewsSep 21: 1,881 viewsSep 22: 1,844 viewsSep 23: 1,742 viewsSep 23: 1,695 viewsSep 24: 1,517 viewsSep 24: 1,505 viewsSep 24: 1,457 viewsSep 24: 1,518 viewsSep 24: 1,550 viewsSep 25: 1,499 viewsSep 25: 1,430 viewsSep 25: 1,302 viewsSep 25: 1,243 viewsSep 25: 1,200 viewsSep 26: 1,089 viewsSep 26: 758 viewsSep 26: 1,168 viewsSep 26: 1,564 viewsSep 26: 1,673 viewsSep 26: 1,622 viewsSep 26: 1,659 viewsSep 26: 1,652 viewsSep 26: 1,521 viewsSep 26: 760 views Sep 20Sep 26
  • post views
  • 10 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,517

Maximum: 1,903 views. Data as of Sep 26.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.2% with 693,612 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. There are subscribers, but almost no views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 64, grade CJun 11Aug 15: index 35, grade FAug 15Sep 26: index 35, grade FSep 26

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Questions about @kripota4

Is it safe to buy ads on the @kripota4 channel?

The channel received a risk index of 65 out of 100 (red level), and ad placement is rated as questionable. Views are inconsistent with other metrics, so the ad reach forecast is unreliable.

What is the real reach of posts in the channel?

Median views are around 1.5 thousand per post with a base of nearly 700 thousand subscribers. Only about 0.2% of the audience reaches the posts.

Why is ad placement here considered questionable?

The reason for the verdict is the inconsistency of views with other channel metrics and the ongoing loss of readers. Evaluating the cost of advertising based on the total number of subscribers makes no practical sense here.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-26
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @kripota4 assessment dated 2026-09-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 693,612 subscribers, median post views were 1,517, ERR was 0.2%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.