TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @ripaojiedian

@ripaojiedian: statistics and cleanliness index

分享社-节点|破解|VPN|分享

广告/投稿/咨询 @ow88wo 节点使用教程前往频道 @fanqiangteach 永久免费分享节点，维护频道订阅，每天分享有趣的东西，破解软件，好的网站，各种资源分享

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-23
Subscribers
479,599
Median views
11,072
ERR
2.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Chinese
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-10-23 — 15 days old.

Assessment summary

A Chinese channel about hacked apps, VPN services and free proxies, which has been run for almost six years and posts mainly at night. Over the last 319 messages, about 87% of numbers have been deleted, and views are almost the same for all posts.

With 479 thousand subscribers, the median post is seen by only about 11 thousand people — reach is significantly lower than the number of subscribers. For advertising, this means that a placement will pay off not across the entire base, but on a small share of it.

About the channel

A Chinese channel where hacked apps, VPN services and free proxies are shared. The feed consists of short posts with photos and videos: ads for paid VPNs, download links for hacked software, and also dubious offers — from selling personal data to adult content.

In the catalog, it sits next to @gitbig, @sharaapk and @apkgeek. By subscriber count, the channel is larger than @gitbig and @sharaapk but smaller than @apkgeek; however, a smaller share of subscribers sees a post than for each of them.

What it publishes:

  • Hacked apps: VPNs, apps for watching movies and comics with unlocked features.
  • VPN and proxy ads: posts offering to connect to paid block-bypass services.
  • Dubious services: selling access to personal data databases, gambling and adult content.

Posts come out mainly at night and on weekdays; there are no forwards from other channels. From the feed, expect short notes with plenty of ads and links, not long texts.

By subscribers, it ranks #14 of 102 channels in the Computer science niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.3%

View-based engagement is below the norm for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

The feed is dominated by VPN and proxy ads; there are also posts selling personal data, gambling and explicit content — these are signs of scam and intrusive advertising.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 177,372 to 1,222,631 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 7 of 7
@ripaojiedian 2.3%
similar channels median 7.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 5 of 6
@ripaojiedian 0.45
similar channels median 0.21

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 8 to Oct 23. The dashed line is the median (11,072).

049K97KOct 8: 86,147 viewsOct 9: 87,389 viewsOct 10: 97,042 viewsOct 11: 83,861 viewsOct 12: 72,666 viewsOct 13: 69,025 viewsOct 14: 65,118 viewsOct 15: 60,108 viewsOct 16: 62,277 viewsOct 17: 48,412 viewsOct 18: 39,253 viewsOct 19: 31,269 viewsOct 20: 26,042 viewsOct 21: 21,210 viewsOct 22: 20,802 viewsOct 22: 19,132 viewsOct 22: 17,699 viewsOct 22: 21,735 viewsOct 22: 19,727 viewsOct 23: 6,794 viewsOct 23: 6,775 viewsOct 23: 6,785 viewsOct 23: 6,580 viewsOct 23: 6,656 viewsOct 23: 7,350 viewsOct 23: 9,232 viewsOct 23: 10,100 viewsOct 23: 9,502 viewsOct 23: 8,185 viewsOct 23: 8,051 viewsOct 23: 8,036 viewsOct 23: 8,318 viewsOct 23: 8,166 viewsOct 23: 7,257 viewsOct 23: 7,269 viewsOct 23: 6,937 viewsOct 23: 11,120 viewsOct 23: 10,370 viewsOct 23: 11,024 viewsOct 23: 4,631 views Oct 8Oct 23
  • post views
  • 21 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 11,072

Maximum: 97,042 views. Data as of Oct 23.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.3%

View-based engagement is below the norm for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 27,130–54,260 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 22 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 15 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @ripaojiedian

What is the cleanliness of the @ripaojiedian channel?

The cleanliness index is 50 out of 100, grade D, level “there are deviations.” This means that noticeable deviations were found in the metrics.

Why does the channel have low reach?

ERR is about 2.3%: a small share of subscribers sees the median post. At the same time, views are almost identical across all posts.

Should I advertise in this channel?

The appropriateness of placement was assessed as questionable: the reason is that a small share of subscribers sees posts. This is not a ban, but the advertising reach will be lower than the subscriber count.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-23
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @ripaojiedian assessment dated 2026-10-23 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 479,599 subscribers, median post views were 11,072, ERR was 2.3%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.