TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @pro_investing_channel

@pro_investing_channel: statistics and cleanliness index

PRO Крипту & Инвест

Канал о криптовалютах, блокчейне и финтехе. -------- По рекламе, cотрудничеству — @Tan1r

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
22,297
Median views
577
ERR
2.6%
Posts sampled
40

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates a natural distribution of views without technical signs of inflation (CV 0.31); however, audience engagement is extremely low: with 22 thousand subscribers, the median is only 577 views. A gain of more than 6.2 thousand users over the last 74 days has had almost no effect on view growth, indicating the acquisition of an inactive or uninterested audience.

With a posting frequency of 6.5 posts per day, an advertising message will quickly move down the feed and reach only a small fraction of the declared base.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It may be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 8,745 to 45,848 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 12 of 12
@pro_investing_channel 2.6%
similar channels median 16.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 11 of 11
@pro_investing_channel 0.13
similar channels median 0.62

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (577).

05311.1KSep 2: 979 viewsSep 2: 937 viewsSep 2: 956 viewsSep 3: 705 viewsSep 3: 652 viewsSep 3: 730 viewsSep 3: 787 viewsSep 3: 1,063 viewsSep 3: 706 viewsSep 4: 613 viewsSep 4: 599 viewsSep 4: 652 viewsSep 4: 714 viewsSep 4: 948 viewsSep 4: 834 viewsSep 5: 803 viewsSep 6: 611 viewsSep 6: 557 viewsSep 7: 420 viewsSep 7: 406 viewsSep 7: 444 viewsSep 7: 489 viewsSep 7: 565 viewsSep 7: 568 viewsSep 7: 575 viewsSep 7: 531 viewsSep 7: 526 viewsSep 7: 524 viewsSep 7: 504 viewsSep 7: 589 viewsSep 7: 633 viewsSep 7: 579 viewsSep 7: 563 viewsSep 7: 458 viewsSep 8: 389 viewsSep 8: 384 viewsSep 8: 415 viewsSep 8: 480 viewsSep 8: 364 viewsSep 8: 200 views Sep 2Sep 8
  • post views
  • 8 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 577

Maximum: 1,063 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It may be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 22: index 81, grade AJun 22Jun 26: index 91, grade A+Jun 26Sep 8: index 81, grade ASep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 418–564 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @pro_investing_channel

Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?

Deterministic verification revealed a low risk (19 out of 100): view distribution is even, and no signs of bots in views were recorded.

What reach performance can be expected from a publication?

The median reach is around 577 views per post, covering only 2.6% of the total number of subscribers.

Why is ad placement marked as questionable?

The reason is poor reach: the active part of the audience is extremely small relative to the channel's nominal size, so ad return will be limited.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @pro_investing_channel assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 22,297 subscribers, median post views were 577, ERR was 2.6%, and the cleanliness index was 81/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.