TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @investor_hamster

@investor_hamster: statistics and cleanliness index

Главный инвестор

Ежедневные комбо и шифры! Перспективные проекты! Реклама/Сотрудничество - @oneterro

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-29
Subscribers
43,430
Median views
14,777
ERR
34%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-09-29 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel focuses on cryptocurrency news, the TON ecosystem, and price dynamics of Telegram digital gifts.

Over three months, more than five thousand people unsubscribed from the channel, yet the median views remained the same, and the variation between posts was just 0.03. Given the publishing hiatus of over 50 days and disabled comments, actual reach is difficult to predict.

What to pay attention to

Nearly identical views across all posts (CV ≈ 0.03)

Views barely differ from post to post. Usually, variation is noticeable: some posts get more reads, others fewer.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 13 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 15,129 to 80,509 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 9 of 13
@investor_hamster 34%
similar channels median 14.7%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 12
@investor_hamster 0.3
similar channels median 0.61

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 6 to Aug 6. The dashed line is the median (14,777).

07.8K16KAug 6: 15,091 viewsAug 10: 15,028 viewsAug 14: 15,235 viewsAug 20: 14,788 viewsAug 22: 15,352 viewsAug 31: 15,373 viewsSep 1: 15,534 viewsSep 11: 15,243 viewsSep 22: 15,030 viewsSep 27: 15,207 viewsOct 9: 14,749 viewsOct 9: 15,414 viewsOct 19: 15,237 viewsOct 20: 15,315 viewsOct 24: 14,511 viewsNov 13: 14,954 viewsNov 21: 14,580 viewsNov 27: 14,422 viewsNov 28: 14,648 viewsDec 17: 14,495 viewsDec 18: 14,799 viewsDec 25: 14,917 viewsDec 31: 14,949 viewsJan 9: 14,930 viewsJan 16: 15,002 viewsJan 25: 15,232 viewsFeb 7: 14,766 viewsFeb 21: 14,365 viewsMar 9: 13,942 viewsMar 10: 14,034 viewsMar 12: 14,200 viewsMar 28: 14,217 viewsApr 7: 14,102 viewsApr 8: 14,445 viewsMay 10: 14,126 viewsMay 11: 14,634 viewsMay 29: 14,534 viewsJul 19: 13,752 viewsJul 20: 13,865 viewsAug 6: 13,512 views Aug 6Aug 6
  • post views
  • median 14,777

Maximum: 15,534 views. Data as of Sep 29.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Nearly identical views across all posts (CV ≈ 0.03)

Views barely differ from post to post. Usually, variation is noticeable: some posts get more reads, others fewer.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 30, grade FJun 11Sep 29: index 30, grade FSep 29

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Questions about @investor_hamster

What is the risk score of the “Главный инвестор” channel?

The channel received 70 points out of 100 (red risk zone). The primary factor in the assessment is unnaturally flat views from post to post.

What do the audience engagement metrics show?

With an ERR reach of around 34.02%, only 0.3% of readers leave reactions, comments are disabled, and the view variation remains at an atypically low level of 0.03.

Is advertising in @investor_hamster justified?

The advisability of advertising is assessed as doubtful: views do not align with audience activity, and no new posts have been published for nearly two months.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-29
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @investor_hamster assessment dated 2026-09-29 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 43,430 subscribers, median post views were 14,777, ERR was 34.0%, and the cleanliness index was 30/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.