TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @nftaurora

@nftaurora: statistics and cleanliness index

aurora

owner - @goldskiss price - @prauroras stars - @aurorst_bot

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-30
Subscribers
9,844
Median views
4,723
ERR
48%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 months

Data from 2026-09-30 — 8 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel focuses on the Telegram gifts and digital items market, as well as Stars giveaways. Posts gather a high relative reach — an ERR of 48.0% exceeds the figures of 16 out of 18 similar channels in the catalog, but some messages have been deleted from the feed (about 98% of IDs are missing), and over the past month, subscriber outflow reached 21%.

The channel has not published updates for 33 days. Due to the prolonged inactivity, audience engagement remains uncertain, and the reach of a new post may turn out to be significantly lower than the previous median.

What to pay attention to

Sharp subscriber drop: −21% since the last check

Between checks, the channel lost a noticeable share of its subscribers. Usually, the subscriber count changes more smoothly.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 19 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 3,298 to 22,297 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 16 of 19
@nftaurora 48%
similar channels median 15%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 13 of 19
@nftaurora 1.18
similar channels median 0.72

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Apr 14 to Aug 28. The dashed line is the median (4,723).

04.6K9.2KApr 14: 2,867 viewsApr 16: 3,595 viewsApr 18: 4,781 viewsApr 18: 5,088 viewsApr 18: 5,548 viewsApr 19: 4,811 viewsApr 20: 4,531 viewsApr 23: 3,990 viewsApr 30: 3,536 viewsMay 1: 3,655 viewsMay 3: 2,762 viewsMay 3: 2,913 viewsMay 4: 3,101 viewsMay 5: 4,686 viewsMay 7: 3,380 viewsMay 9: 4,642 viewsMay 24: 3,299 viewsMay 24: 4,124 viewsJul 6: 4,019 viewsJul 6: 5,463 viewsJul 7: 6,059 viewsJul 7: 4,679 viewsJul 7: 6,088 viewsJul 9: 4,560 viewsJul 11: 6,142 viewsJul 13: 5,439 viewsJul 14: 5,385 viewsJul 14: 7,289 viewsJul 17: 6,153 viewsJul 19: 4,761 viewsJul 20: 5,949 viewsJul 21: 9,155 viewsAug 2: 5,821 viewsAug 5: 4,676 viewsAug 5: 6,277 viewsAug 13: 4,831 viewsAug 14: 4,797 viewsAug 14: 5,336 viewsAug 20: 4,414 viewsAug 28: 3,180 views Apr 14Aug 28
  • post views
  • median 4,723

Maximum: 9,155 views. Data as of Sep 30.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 12: index 84, grade AJun 12Sep 8: index 50, grade DSep 8Sep 30: index 45, grade DSep 30

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @nftaurora

What is the integrity index assigned to the channel @nftaurora?

The channel's integrity index is 45 out of 100 (grade D, "anomalies detected" level). The main factors reducing the score were the skipping of about 98% of post IDs and the loss of a fifth of the audience within a month.

Why is placing ads in the channel considered questionable?

The reason for this verdict is the lack of activity: the channel has not published posts for over 30 days. During periods of inactivity, the audience loses engagement, making it difficult to predict view counts for a new ad.

What are the actual reader engagement metrics?

The median views across the remaining posts is 4,723 (ERR around 48.0%), and 1.18% of readers leave reactions. This is higher than the metrics of most similar channels in the catalog, but it relies on posts from a month ago.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-30
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @nftaurora assessment dated 2026-09-30 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 9,844 subscribers, median post views were 4,723, ERR was 48.0%, and the cleanliness index was 45/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.