TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @crypto_way_up

@crypto_way_up: statistics and cleanliness index

Crypto Vasya

Крипта с нуля🫨 Ничего сам не знаю, но обязательно разберусь. Присоединяетесь ведь ракета 🚀 заряжена По приобретению рекламы и сотрудничеству писать @by_monster

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-28
Subscribers
569,798
Median views
1,799
ERR
0.3%
Posts sampled
39
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-09-28 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is virtually abandoned: there have been no publications for more than two months, and the outflow has exceeded 52 thousand subscribers in a month and a half amid rare posts and weak engagement.

Combined with isolated spikes in paid stars and low activity of the base, the post reach forecast is unreliable.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.3% with 569 798 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible fraction of the audience. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 39 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 35 to 1,563,890 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 39 of 39
@crypto_way_up 0.3%
similar channels median 16.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 34 of 37
@crypto_way_up 0.28
similar channels median 1.11

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 39 posts with views, from Jan 25 to Jul 18. The dashed line is the median (1,799).

02.8K5.6KJan 25: 1,770 viewsJan 25: 2,185 viewsJan 27: 1,761 viewsFeb 3: 1,959 viewsFeb 8: 1,490 viewsFeb 8: 1,518 viewsFeb 8: 1,485 viewsFeb 8: 1,351 viewsFeb 8: 1,855 viewsFeb 8: 2,221 viewsFeb 8: 1,799 viewsFeb 10: 1,873 viewsFeb 10: 1,951 viewsFeb 11: 2,159 viewsFeb 11: 2,020 viewsFeb 11: 2,561 viewsMar 1: 1,875 viewsMar 2: 1,767 viewsMar 2: 1,679 viewsMar 2: 1,821 viewsMar 2: 1,508 viewsMar 4: 1,724 viewsMar 4: 1,681 viewsMar 7: 1,440 viewsMar 8: 1,747 viewsMar 8: 1,799 viewsMar 17: 1,235 viewsMar 17: 1,482 viewsMar 17: 1,361 viewsMar 17: 1,209 viewsMar 17: 1,438 viewsMar 17: 1,713 viewsMar 18: 1,962 viewsMar 18: 2,530 viewsMar 18: 3,328 viewsMar 18: 4,011 viewsMar 23: 4,535 viewsMar 24: 5,594 viewsJul 18: 2,266 views Jan 25Jul 18
  • post views
  • median 1,799

Maximum: 5,594 views. Data as of Sep 28.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.3% with 569 798 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible fraction of the audience. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 11: index 35, grade FAug 11Sep 28: index 35, grade FSep 28

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Questions about @crypto_way_up

What is the risk assessment for advertising in @crypto_way_up?

The channel received a risk score of 65 out of 100 in the red zone. The feasibility of ad placement is assessed as dubious due to the discrepancy between views and the total size of the subscriber base.

What real reach do posts get?

With a base of over 569 thousand subscribers, median views are about 1800 per post (ERR around 0.3%). This means that a negligibly small portion of the audience sees the feed.

Why is advertising considered dubious?

The channel has not published new posts for over 70 days, is losing tens of thousands of subscribers, and existing views are inconsistent with other metrics.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-28
Sample
The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypto_way_up assessment dated 2026-09-28 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 569,798 subscribers, median post views were 1,799, ERR was 0.3%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.