Fake engagement check for @madcryptogifts
Безумный Шляпник🎩 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-21.
По рекламе @philippganza Новости мира подарков Делаем розыгрыши и раздаем призы! https://t.me/madhaterchat наш безумный чат *Информация в канале не является финансовой рекомендацией
Evidence snapshot
The @madcryptogifts assessment dated 2026-08-21 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 131,434 subscribers, median post views were 2,369, ERR was 1.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: not recommended.
A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,649–2,389 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Advertising posts have a median of 2,546 views versus 2,379 for organic posts.
Based on 3 advertising and 31 organic posts older than two days.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-21. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @madcryptogiftsQuestions about @madcryptogifts
What does grade D mean for @madcryptogifts?
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What is the ERR of @madcryptogifts?
ERR is 1.8%. Median post views equal 1.8% of the channel's 131,434 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.
How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?
The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.
Similar checked channels
- 100 · A+
-
@andruxinv — °™°
100 · A+
-
@daodaolockin — Кирюша куколдит
100 · A+
-
@stratton_reviews — Stratton Reviews
100 · A+
- 97 · A+
-
@newton_gifts — NEWTON
96 · A+
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.