TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @crypt0chka

@crypt0chka: statistics and cleanliness index

Крипта и точка

Все важное здесь. Только биткоин, только криптовалюта, только хардкор. Сотрудничество: @Bdv740

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-06
Subscribers
70,347
Median views
10,452
ERR
14.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies

Data from 2026-09-06 — 32 days old.

Assessment summary

Channel metrics show a natural view distribution without signs of artificial inflation, but the feed has been inactive for over a month, during which the channel lost more than 3.5 thousand subscribers.

When returning from such a long pause, the first ad post risks failing to reach the previous median of 10.4 thousand views due to muted notifications and lower engagement.

What to pay attention to

Comments disabled on a large channel

Comments are closed on a channel with over 10,000 subscribers. Weak signal: this is sometimes done to hide the lack of an active audience.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 38 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 35 to 1,563,890 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 21 of 38
@crypt0chka 14.9%
similar channels median 16.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 35 of 36
@crypt0chka 0.26
similar channels median 1.15

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 30 to Aug 5. The dashed line is the median (10,452).

06.4K13KJul 30: 12,398 viewsJul 30: 12,571 viewsJul 30: 12,242 viewsJul 30: 12,629 viewsJul 31: 12,844 viewsJul 31: 12,365 viewsJul 31: 12,346 viewsJul 31: 12,460 viewsJul 31: 12,416 viewsJul 31: 12,725 viewsJul 31: 12,669 viewsJul 31: 12,038 viewsJul 31: 11,631 viewsJul 31: 11,303 viewsAug 1: 12,389 viewsAug 1: 11,556 viewsAug 1: 12,507 viewsAug 1: 12,248 viewsAug 1: 11,192 viewsAug 2: 10,876 viewsAug 2: 10,028 viewsAug 2: 9,432 viewsAug 2: 9,538 viewsAug 2: 9,938 viewsAug 3: 9,429 viewsAug 3: 9,453 viewsAug 3: 9,223 viewsAug 3: 9,257 viewsAug 3: 9,333 viewsAug 3: 9,852 viewsAug 3: 9,427 viewsAug 4: 9,170 viewsAug 4: 9,070 viewsAug 4: 9,253 viewsAug 4: 8,851 viewsAug 4: 8,368 viewsAug 4: 7,753 viewsAug 5: 7,583 viewsAug 5: 87 viewsAug 5: 98 views Jul 30Aug 5
  • post views
  • median 10,452

Maximum: 12,844 views. Data as of Sep 6.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 7: index 95, grade A+Aug 7Sep 6: index 95, grade A+Sep 6

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @crypt0chka

Are there signs of audience or view inflation on the channel?

Deterministic verification assigned the channel a minimum risk score of 5 out of 100: view distribution is stable, and no signs of bots were found in the metrics.

What level of engagement do the posts show?

The median view count stands at 10,452 with an ERR of around 14.86%, but fewer than 0.3% of readers leave reactions.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason for this status is inactivity: no posts have been published on the channel for over 30 days, and subscriber dynamics over the month dropped by 3,533 people.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-06
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypt0chka assessment dated 2026-09-06 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 70,347 subscribers, median post views were 10,452, ERR was 14.9%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.