TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @kriptar_official

Fake engagement check for @kriptar_official

Криптаръ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
35
Median views
36
ERR
102.9%
Posts sampled
17

Assessment summary

The channel is at the launch stage — only 35 subscribers and 17 publications, so the deterministic score of 4 has low confidence due to the small sample size. A median of 36 views with a reach over 100% and increased dispersion (CV 1.30) are typical for a new blog with isolated forwards, while a third of deleted posts is related to the initial setup of the content grid. For an advertiser, the key limitation lies in scale: even with a complete absence of fake engagement, a publication at the current stage will gather only a few dozen views.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 25 checked Cryptocurrencies channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 38 to 1,271,533 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 21 of 25
102.9% for @kriptar_official similar channels median: 17.5%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 23 of 24
5.97 for @kriptar_official similar channels median: 0.81

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 17 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @kriptar_official assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 17 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 35 subscribers, median post views were 36, ERR was 102.9%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 17.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 17 posts with views, from Aug 24 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (36).

06701.3KAug 24: 29 viewsAug 25: 1,275 viewsAug 26: 1,341 viewsAug 26: 35 viewsAug 27: 34 viewsAug 28: 40 viewsAug 31: 39 viewsSep 1: 910 viewsSep 1: 34 viewsSep 2: 658 viewsSep 2: 984 viewsSep 3: 33 viewsSep 3: 36 viewsSep 4: 849 viewsSep 5: 23 viewsSep 7: 19 viewsSep 8: 13 views Aug 24Sep 8

Maximum: 1,341 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@kriptar_official's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Check today: @kriptar_official

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @kriptar_official and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @kriptar_official

Questions about @kriptar_official

Are there signs of fake engagement on the channel?

The deterministic check showed minimal risk (4 out of 100), but due to a base of only 35 subscribers, the confidence of the analysis remains low.

What reach can a publication deliver?

The median reach is 36 views per post, so in absolute numbers, an ad will be seen by only a small starting audience.

Is advertising on this resource justified?

Placement is considered justified based on content quality, but the economic return is limited by the microscopic size of the current audience.

Similar channels in Cryptocurrencies

All channels in Cryptocurrencies

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @kriptar_official