TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @cryptogram_web3

@cryptogram_web3: statistics and cleanliness index

Криптограм 👾

Аналитически - новостной ресурс, в котором рассказываем о криптовалюте 👾 🔥 Реклама: @prague_biz

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-25
Subscribers
406,842
Median views
4,579
ERR
1.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-25 — 13 days old.

Assessment summary

With a base of over 400 thousand subscribers, posts gather around 4.5 thousand views amidst an outflow of nearly 3 thousand readers over recent weeks.

For an advertiser, this means that the bulk of the audience does not read the feed, so evaluating the cost of an ad placement based on the subscriber count is not advisable.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.1% with 406 842 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: posts are seen by only a small fraction of subscribers. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 39 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 35 to 1,563,890 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 39 of 39
@cryptogram_web3 1.1%
similar channels median 16.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 34 of 37
@cryptogram_web3 0.3
similar channels median 1.11

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Sep 25. The dashed line is the median (4,579).

03.3K6.5KSep 2: 6,089 viewsSep 3: 5,763 viewsSep 3: 6,272 viewsSep 4: 6,523 viewsSep 5: 5,952 viewsSep 6: 6,075 viewsSep 7: 5,692 viewsSep 7: 5,572 viewsSep 8: 5,239 viewsSep 8: 5,265 viewsSep 9: 4,624 viewsSep 9: 5,320 viewsSep 10: 4,922 viewsSep 10: 5,215 viewsSep 11: 5,157 viewsSep 12: 5,332 viewsSep 12: 5,594 viewsSep 13: 5,044 viewsSep 13: 5,116 viewsSep 14: 4,534 viewsSep 14: 4,719 viewsSep 15: 4,480 viewsSep 15: 4,312 viewsSep 16: 4,344 viewsSep 17: 3,917 viewsSep 17: 3,614 viewsSep 18: 3,399 viewsSep 18: 3,322 viewsSep 19: 3,087 viewsSep 20: 3,170 viewsSep 20: 3,383 viewsSep 21: 3,727 viewsSep 21: 3,683 viewsSep 22: 3,248 viewsSep 22: 3,044 viewsSep 23: 2,521 viewsSep 24: 2,081 viewsSep 24: 1,918 viewsSep 25: 1,530 viewsSep 25: 691 views Sep 2Sep 25
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,579

Maximum: 6,523 views. Data as of Sep 25.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.1% with 406 842 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: posts are seen by only a small fraction of subscribers. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 6: index 55, grade CAug 6Sep 5: index 55, grade CSep 5Sep 25: index 55, grade CSep 25

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,643–1,959 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @cryptogram_web3

Is it worth advertising in the channel @cryptogram_web3?

The feasibility of placement is assessed as questionable: the risk index is at the yellow level (45 out of 100), and posts are seen by only a negligible fraction of the audience.

What is the actual reach of posts in the channel?

The median view count is 4 579 per post, which translates to a reach of about 1.1% of the subscriber base. Less than 0.01% of the audience leaves reactions.

Why is the placement verdict marked as questionable?

The main reason is the weak reach of posts given a total base of over 406 thousand subscribers, which makes contact with the audience disproportionately small.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @cryptogram_web3 assessment dated 2026-09-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 406,842 subscribers, median post views were 4,579, ERR was 1.1%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.