TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @crypto_stukach

@crypto_stukach: statistics and cleanliness index

Крипто Стукач | Инвестиции | Заработок

💰 О крипте и инвестициях простым языком. Новости, разборы, аирдропы, перспективные проекты и рыночные тренды без сложных терминов. Реклама в канале — @TGowner999, @topovik_999 Инфо о нашей сети: https://t.me/TGownerTOP

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-23
Subscribers
542,926
Median views
1,743
ERR
0.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-23 — 15 days old.

Assessment summary

Crypto news channel: short summaries about exchanges, ETFs, hacks, and regulators, almost always with an image and a link to the original source.

ERR 0.3% versus the median 12.3% for similar channels in the catalog — the post is seen by a smaller share of subscribers than any of them. Over 78 days, the base shrank by about 47 thousand, while the median views remained the same, around 1,740, and some messages have also been deleted (about 17% of numbers are missing): reach does not grow with the base, and advertising here collects the same one and a half thousand views as it did three months ago.

About the channel

Russian-language crypto news channel: short summaries about exchanges, ETFs, regulators, and hacks, almost always with an image and a link to the original source — Binance, Coindesk, crypto.news, and others. The channel has been run for two and a half years; the feed consists almost entirely of its own posts, with few reposts and ads in the sample.

In the catalog, @cryptogram_web3, @crypt0chka, and @cashflowincrypto are nearby. By subscribers, this channel is larger than each of them, but the share of subscribers who see a post is lower: @cryptogram_web3 has ERR 1.1%, @crypt0chka — 15.7%, @cashflowincrypto — 7.0% versus 0.3% here.

What it publishes:

  • Regulators and banks: New York court against NovaTech founders, OCC rules for stablecoins, launch of crypto custody at Deutsche Bank.
  • ETFs and exchanges: bitcoin ETF inflows and outflows, approval of a Swiss spot ETF, quarterly BNB burn of $1 billion.
  • Hacks and security: key leak in Fearless Wallet, phishing against NGRAVE users, withdrawal of $61 million through Tornado Cash.
  • Token movements: VOXEL and FXS crashes of 68–70% in an hour, bitcoin rebound from $80,000.

Posts come out evenly, most often in the afternoon and morning, on weekdays — three quarters of publications; from other channels during the sample there was one repost, from “World TOP Network.”. By subscriber count, the channel is in the top third of the “Cryptocurrencies” niche. Expect a stream of short news notes, 3-4 per day, with images and links to sources — quick to read, but the feed updates often.

By subscribers, it ranks #8 of 83 channels in the Cryptocurrencies niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.3% with 542,926 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: the post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed contains an ad for a crypto casino with a deposit from $10 and a promo code, as well as a post offering package placements across a network of channels.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 201,996 to 1,468,187 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 6
@crypto_stukach 0.3%
similar channels median 12.3%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 3 of 5
@crypto_stukach 0.45
similar channels median 0.36

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 11 to Oct 23. The dashed line is the median (1,743).

01K2KOct 11: 1,782 viewsOct 11: 1,872 viewsOct 11: 1,827 viewsOct 12: 1,864 viewsOct 12: 1,922 viewsOct 12: 1,896 viewsOct 13: 1,856 viewsOct 13: 1,867 viewsOct 13: 1,674 viewsOct 14: 1,950 viewsOct 14: 1,788 viewsOct 14: 1,858 viewsOct 15: 1,876 viewsOct 15: 1,888 viewsOct 15: 2,026 viewsOct 16: 1,819 viewsOct 16: 1,803 viewsOct 16: 1,775 viewsOct 17: 1,576 viewsOct 17: 1,712 viewsOct 17: 1,830 viewsOct 18: 1,548 viewsOct 18: 1,573 viewsOct 18: 1,600 viewsOct 18: 1,793 viewsOct 19: 1,795 viewsOct 19: 1,678 viewsOct 19: 1,583 viewsOct 20: 1,325 viewsOct 20: 1,135 viewsOct 20: 1,292 viewsOct 20: 1,294 viewsOct 21: 1,327 viewsOct 21: 1,264 viewsOct 21: 1,310 viewsOct 22: 1,154 viewsOct 22: 1,111 viewsOct 22: 1,072 viewsOct 23: 740 viewsOct 23: 385 views Oct 11Oct 23
  • post views
  • 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,743

Maximum: 2,026 views. Data as of Oct 23.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.3% with 542,926 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: the post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. Subscribers exist, but there are almost no views.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 6: index 35, grade FAug 6Oct 20: index 35, grade FOct 20Oct 23: index 35, grade FOct 23

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Almost every post is advertising, so there's nothing to compare with.

Without an ad label: 38 posts.

Questions about @crypto_stukach

What does the channel purity index show?

The purity index is 35 out of 100, grade F, level “many deviations”: the higher the index, the fewer deviations in the metrics.

What share of subscribers sees a post in this channel?

ERR is about 0.3%: with 542,926 subscribers, the median views are about 1,743. Similar channels in the catalog have a median ERR of 12.3%.

Can I advertise here?

Placement is marked as questionable: the purity index is low due to deviations in the metrics, so how many people will see the ad is hard to say in advance.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-23
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypto_stukach assessment dated 2026-10-23 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 542,926 subscribers, median post views were 1,743, ERR was 0.3%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.