Fake engagement check for @cryptanci
300 Криптанцев — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-19.
🛡 Легион криптанцев 🛡 Сотрудничество, реклама @crptanec 🛡 Лучший чат @cryptancichat 🛡 Менеджеры (без оплаты): @egor_unique, @maxvane, @thegranfix, @LordgamesTV
Evidence snapshot
The @cryptanci assessment dated 2026-08-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 82,159 subscribers, median post views were 9,216, ERR was 11.2%, and the cleanliness index was 45/100.
Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 6,801–7,002 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Advertising posts have a median of 10,108 views versus 9,311 for organic posts.
Based on 3 advertising and 32 organic posts older than two days.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-19. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @cryptanciQuestions about @cryptanci
What does grade D mean for @cryptanci?
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What is the ERR of @cryptanci?
ERR is 11.2%. Median post views equal 11.2% of the channel's 82,159 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.
How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?
The 45/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.
Similar checked channels
- 100 · A+
-
@andruxinv — °™°
100 · A+
-
@daodaolockin — Кирюша куколдит
100 · A+
-
@stratton_reviews — Stratton Reviews
100 · A+
- 97 · A+
-
@newton_gifts — NEWTON
96 · A+
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.