TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @awolfcrypto

@awolfcrypto: statistics and cleanliness index

CRYPTOWOLF

Научу разбираться в крипте! Информация в этом канале не является финансовой рекомендацией или призывом к действию! Вы можете всё потерять! Мы ничего не продаем! 💬 Чат для общения: https://t.me/+WvmBTo2t49MxYjli Реклама и сотрудничество: t.me/wolfpn

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
6,094
Median views
2,544
ERR
41.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The low risk score confirms the absence of signs of manipulation: open comments and an organic view spread indicate an active audience.

However, placement is questionable due to a six-month hiatus in the feed: the last post was published over 190 days ago, so if publishing suddenly resumes, an ad post risks triggering a wave of unfollows and failing to reach the previous 2.5 thousand views.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,351 to 18,137 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 16 of 18
@awolfcrypto 41.7%
similar channels median 14.8%
Reactions per 100 views at the median
@awolfcrypto 0.74
similar channels median 0.77

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 13 to Mar 1. The dashed line is the median (2,544).

03.4K6.8KSep 13: 2,699 viewsSep 21: 2,189 viewsSep 23: 1,872 viewsSep 24: 1,757 viewsSep 24: 1,876 viewsSep 25: 2,133 viewsSep 26: 2,081 viewsSep 27: 2,491 viewsSep 29: 2,344 viewsOct 1: 2,638 viewsOct 5: 2,451 viewsOct 5: 2,535 viewsOct 8: 2,312 viewsOct 10: 2,515 viewsOct 11: 2,665 viewsOct 11: 2,926 viewsOct 12: 2,853 viewsOct 15: 2,783 viewsOct 15: 3,165 viewsOct 22: 3,133 viewsOct 24: 3,937 viewsOct 24: 3,814 viewsOct 24: 4,087 viewsOct 27: 4,691 viewsOct 30: 6,830 viewsDec 10: 5,217 viewsDec 31: 3,410 viewsJan 19: 2,153 viewsJan 21: 1,841 viewsJan 22: 1,716 viewsJan 22: 1,908 viewsJan 28: 1,766 viewsJan 29: 2,133 viewsJan 30: 2,417 viewsJan 30: 2,401 viewsFeb 1: 2,553 viewsFeb 3: 3,198 viewsFeb 4: 5,174 viewsFeb 13: 6,116 viewsMar 1: 6,202 views Sep 13Mar 1
  • post views
  • median 2,544

Maximum: 6,830 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 100, grade A+Jun 14Sep 8: index 92, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @awolfcrypto

Are there signs of fake subscribers or view manipulation on the channel?

The channel has a minimal risk score of 8 out of 100; deterministic checks revealed no direct anomalies or obvious signs of manipulation.

Why is ad placement on the channel considered questionable?

The channel has been inactive for a long time—the last publication was over 190 days ago, which may have significantly reduced audience attention.

What are the baseline reach metrics for posts on the channel?

The median view count on recorded posts is 2544 with an ERR of around 41.7%, and comments are open for readers.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @awolfcrypto assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,094 subscribers, median post views were 2,544, ERR was 41.7%, and the cleanliness index was 92/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.