TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @DropMezantrop

@DropMezantrop: statistics and cleanliness index

Дропы от Мизантропа

Узнай и получи самое интересное с мира аирдропов с уважением от Мизантропа. ✍️По вопросам сотрудничества пишем сообщение каналу!

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-28
Subscribers
158,407
Median views
655
ERR
0.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Airdrops
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-09-28 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

With an audience exceeding 150 thousand people, posts gather only about 650 views, and over the past month, more than 7 thousand readers have unsubscribed from the channel — this is typical for crypto gaming channels where users en masse abandoned the feed after the hype subsided.

Advertising here is questionable: views are inconsistent with the scale of the base, so the reach forecast is extremely unreliable for an advertising budget.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.4% with 158,407 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. The subscribers are there, but views are almost non-existent.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 Airdrops catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 2,132 to 213,385 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 8
@DropMezantrop 0.4%
similar channels median 6.7%
Reactions per 100 views at the median
@DropMezantrop 2.4
similar channels median 2.21

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 21 to Sep 28. The dashed line is the median (655).

05371.1KSep 21: 844 viewsSep 22: 727 viewsSep 22: 715 viewsSep 22: 749 viewsSep 22: 670 viewsSep 22: 671 viewsSep 22: 739 viewsSep 23: 743 viewsSep 23: 768 viewsSep 23: 950 viewsSep 23: 1,075 viewsSep 23: 978 viewsSep 24: 737 viewsSep 24: 760 viewsSep 24: 784 viewsSep 24: 655 viewsSep 24: 655 viewsSep 24: 671 viewsSep 25: 587 viewsSep 25: 574 viewsSep 25: 585 viewsSep 25: 590 viewsSep 25: 577 viewsSep 25: 617 viewsSep 26: 568 viewsSep 26: 524 viewsSep 26: 584 viewsSep 26: 709 viewsSep 26: 806 viewsSep 26: 733 viewsSep 27: 552 viewsSep 27: 509 viewsSep 27: 548 viewsSep 27: 573 viewsSep 27: 554 viewsSep 27: 509 viewsSep 28: 333 viewsSep 28: 291 viewsSep 28: 258 viewsSep 28: 144 views Sep 21Sep 28
  • post views
  • 5 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 655

Maximum: 1,075 views. Data as of Sep 28.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.4% with 158,407 subscribers

Median views are fractions of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible part of the audience. The subscribers are there, but views are almost non-existent.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 90, grade AJun 11Aug 18: index 35, grade FAug 18Sep 28: index 35, grade FSep 28

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 2 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

Questions about @DropMezantrop

What is the risk of advertising on the channel @DropMezantrop?

The channel received a risk index of 65 out of 100 (red level), and the feasibility of placement is assessed as questionable. The median reach is inconsistent with the declared audience size, so a stable contact with the post cannot be guaranteed.

What is the actual reach of posts on the channel?

With 158 thousand subscribers, the median is 655 views per post, corresponding to an ERR of around 0.4%. Posts are seen by only an insignificant fraction of the registered base.

Why is the placement feasibility rated as questionable?

The reason for this verdict is that views are inconsistent with the channel's other metrics, making the reach forecast unreliable. In addition, there is a steady churn of audience: over 7 thousand subscribers left the channel in 40 days.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-28
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @DropMezantrop assessment dated 2026-09-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 158,407 subscribers, median post views were 655, ERR was 0.4%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.