TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @M9460

@M9460: statistics and cleanliness index

Ton House 💎

Самые лучшие тапалки которые принесут money💸 atomicbux

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
22,527
Median views
373
ERR
1.7%
Posts sampled
37

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk score confirms the absence of obvious artificial boosting; however, the channel's audience is barely engaged with the content: with 22.5k subscribers, the median is only 373 views.

With more than 8 posts published daily and a 92% share of promotional messages, any sponsored post is immediately pushed out of focus by a feed of repetitive promo codes and third-party spam in the comments.

What to pay attention to

Low reach despite genuine engagement

Reach is below usual, but people react to and discuss the posts. It looks like a long-standing audience that does not read every post.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

Almost the entire feed is filled with promo codes for third-party mini-apps, referral links to clicker games, and direct advertising.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 7 Airdrops catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 2,132 to 213,385 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 7 of 7
@M9460 1.7%
similar channels median 7.3%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 5
@M9460 3.45
similar channels median 1.03

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 37 posts with views, from Sep 4 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (373).

0277554Sep 4: 386 viewsSep 4: 447 viewsSep 4: 383 viewsSep 4: 439 viewsSep 4: 403 viewsSep 4: 434 viewsSep 4: 346 viewsSep 5: 378 viewsSep 5: 357 viewsSep 5: 373 viewsSep 5: 376 viewsSep 5: 359 viewsSep 5: 461 viewsSep 5: 355 viewsSep 5: 358 viewsSep 6: 462 viewsSep 6: 554 viewsSep 6: 500 viewsSep 6: 404 viewsSep 6: 391 viewsSep 6: 392 viewsSep 6: 331 viewsSep 7: 344 viewsSep 7: 334 viewsSep 7: 345 viewsSep 7: 326 viewsSep 7: 372 viewsSep 7: 414 viewsSep 7: 394 viewsSep 7: 444 viewsSep 7: 253 viewsSep 7: 241 viewsSep 8: 261 viewsSep 8: 267 viewsSep 8: 221 viewsSep 8: 214 viewsSep 8: 134 views Sep 4Sep 8
  • post views
  • 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 373

Maximum: 554 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach despite genuine engagement

Reach is below usual, but people react to and discuss the posts. It looks like a long-standing audience that does not read every post.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 63, grade CJun 11Sep 8: index 88, grade ASep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Too many ads — yours will get lost.

About 255–386 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Almost every post is advertising, so there's nothing to compare with.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @M9460

Are there signs of audience boosting on the channel?

The channel's risk score is 12 out of 100 (green zone), which indicates organic metrics. The low engagement rate is due to burnout of the accumulated tap-to-earn user base, rather than bots.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The channel is overloaded with ads: around 92% of all posts contain external links and promo codes. At a frequency of over 8 messages per day, a new post is immediately lost in the feed.

What reach can be expected from a post?

The median views per post is around 373 impressions (ERR 1.66%). The placement's ROI should be evaluated based on the actual reach, rather than the nominal base of 22.5k subscribers.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 37 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @M9460 assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 22,527 subscribers, median post views were 373, ERR was 1.7%, and the cleanliness index was 88/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.