TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @zlifehacker

@zlifehacker: statistics and cleanliness index

Здоровье | Очищение | Питание

🌷Приветствуем вас в нашем канале 👉Очищение 👉Здоровье 👉Питание Сотрудничество и реклама: https://t.me/Sanich487 Официальная реклама: https://telega.in/c/zlifehacker РКН № 6477667964

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-30
Subscribers
15,502
Median views
2,555
ERR
16.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Health & Medicine
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-09-30 — 8 days old.

Assessment summary

A thematic blog about a healthy lifestyle, plant-based nutrition, and homemade recipes with a focus on short videos and illustrated cards.

Although engagement is higher than in most similar catalog channels (reaction rate of 2.14% vs. 0.79%), the feed has been inactive for more than three months. Buying publications in an inactive channel is not advisable: the reach of a new post is unpredictable after such a long pause.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈62% of IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the channel's recent message IDs — some of them were deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones offer only a partial view of the channel.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Health & Medicine catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 5,578 to 43,225 subscribers.

ERR (reach) at the median
@zlifehacker 16.5%
similar channels median 16.8%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 6
@zlifehacker 2.14
similar channels median 1.28

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Feb 26 to Jun 24. The dashed line is the median (2,555).

02K4.1KFeb 26: 2,929 viewsFeb 28: 2,963 viewsMar 3: 2,910 viewsMar 3: 2,315 viewsMar 4: 2,286 viewsMar 4: 2,586 viewsMar 5: 2,666 viewsMar 5: 3,455 viewsMar 10: 2,456 viewsMar 10: 2,901 viewsMar 11: 2,758 viewsMar 12: 3,004 viewsMar 14: 2,707 viewsMar 16: 2,597 viewsMar 18: 2,985 viewsMar 19: 3,475 viewsMar 21: 2,383 viewsMar 23: 2,765 viewsMar 27: 1,969 viewsMar 28: 2,253 viewsMar 31: 2,345 viewsApr 1: 1,617 viewsApr 2: 1,993 viewsApr 4: 2,136 viewsApr 9: 2,083 viewsApr 11: 1,810 viewsApr 11: 2,721 viewsApr 16: 3,350 viewsApr 29: 3,726 viewsMay 5: 2,303 viewsMay 6: 2,512 viewsMay 17: 1,934 viewsMay 19: 1,873 viewsMay 20: 2,866 viewsMay 29: 1,888 viewsJun 1: 1,868 viewsJun 2: 2,525 viewsJun 20: 1,795 viewsJun 24: 2,692 viewsJun 24: 4,087 views Feb 26Jun 24
  • post views
  • median 2,555

Maximum: 4,087 views. Data as of Sep 30.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 15: index 100, grade A+Jun 15Sep 8: index 50, grade DSep 8Sep 30: index 96, grade A+Sep 30

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @zlifehacker

What are the results of checking the channel for metric anomalies?

The channel's purity index is 96 out of 100, assigned a grade of A+ and a "metrics normal" level. Views and engagement metrics are distributed naturally; the only technical peculiarity is the omission of about 62% of message IDs.

How are publications read in this channel?

Median reach is about 2.6 thousand views per post, corresponding to an ERR of 16.5%. This level of attention is higher than typical values among similar catalog channels in the health niche (11.7%).

Is the channel suitable for buying advertising?

The feasibility of placing ads is rated as questionable solely due to inactivity: no new posts have been published for more than three months. Without regular feed updates, the audience cools down, making it difficult to predict the return on integration right now.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-30
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @zlifehacker assessment dated 2026-09-30 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 15,502 subscribers, median post views were 2,555, ERR was 16.5%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.