TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @zakonycnexatg

@zakonycnexatg: statistics and cleanliness index

Закон Успеха | Бизнес, Подкасты

🙌 Финансы, Бизнес, Развитие 📮 По рекламе: @Max_ycnex 📥 Биржа: https://telega.in/c/zakonycnexatg РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/677d21f91e4e233a71dc1df0

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-20
Subscribers
110,756
Median views
3,417
ERR
3.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Motivation & Self-Development
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 years

Data from 2026-09-20 — 19 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk of artificial inflation is confirmed by the natural subscriber churn dynamics and stable view variance; however, the audience is heavily burned out. With a base of over 110 thousand people, posts gather an average of only about 3.4 thousand views, and disabled comments further reduce the value of the contact.

Advertising here is questionable, as the price is often inflated due to the nominal channel size rather than the real reach.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Motivation & Self-Development catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 936 to 36,418 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 5
@zakonycnexatg 3.1%
similar channels median 17.1%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 5
@zakonycnexatg 4.06
similar channels median 1.41

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (3,417).

02.1K4.2KSep 7: 3,605 viewsSep 7: 3,766 viewsSep 8: 3,628 viewsSep 8: 4,248 viewsSep 8: 3,659 viewsSep 9: 3,665 viewsSep 9: 3,661 viewsSep 9: 3,649 viewsSep 10: 3,593 viewsSep 10: 3,389 viewsSep 10: 3,551 viewsSep 11: 3,493 viewsSep 11: 3,442 viewsSep 11: 3,552 viewsSep 12: 3,395 viewsSep 12: 3,217 viewsSep 12: 3,443 viewsSep 13: 3,386 viewsSep 13: 3,233 viewsSep 13: 3,486 viewsSep 14: 3,554 viewsSep 14: 3,713 viewsSep 14: 3,544 viewsSep 15: 3,452 viewsSep 15: 3,439 viewsSep 15: 3,268 viewsSep 16: 3,283 viewsSep 16: 3,079 viewsSep 16: 3,126 viewsSep 17: 2,996 viewsSep 17: 2,972 viewsSep 17: 3,038 viewsSep 18: 2,835 viewsSep 18: 2,778 viewsSep 18: 2,735 viewsSep 19: 2,419 viewsSep 19: 2,345 viewsSep 19: 2,052 viewsSep 20: 1,125 viewsSep 20: 285 views Sep 7Sep 20
  • post views
  • 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 3,417

Maximum: 4,248 views. Data as of Sep 20.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 9: index 86, grade AJul 9Aug 18: index 86, grade AAug 18Sep 20: index 90, grade ASep 20

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,530–2,400 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @zakonycnexatg

Are there inflated subscribers or views on the channel?

The deterministic check revealed no signs of bots, and the risk score is a minimal 10 out of 100. View metrics are distributed evenly, which is typical for real users.

Why is placing an ad considered questionable?

The reason is low reach: posts are viewed by only about 3% of the total subscriber count. Paying for a nominal base of 110 thousand people makes no practical sense with such weak activity.

How many people will actually see an ad post?

The median reach of a single post is about 3,400 views. At a rate of around three posts per day, the ad will get pushed down the feed in just a few hours.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-20
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @zakonycnexatg assessment dated 2026-09-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 110,756 subscribers, median post views were 3,417, ERR was 3.1%, and the cleanliness index was 90/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.