TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @LeveINext

@LeveINext: statistics and cleanliness index

Next level Саморазвитие

#PQ6CJ С нами понимаешь, что можешь ВСЁ. ◽️ Актуальная психология ◽️ Советы для личностного роста Админ: @Liliya_evseeva Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/LeveINext Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://goo.su/iLaUQkx

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
19,140
Median views
9,357
ERR
48.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Psychology & Relationships
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 4 days old.

Assessment summary

Short tips on psychology and personal growth with visual design. The channel has been inactive for more than five months: the last post was published 159 days ago, and the audience has shrunk by more than 4.5 thousand people during this time.

View counts are frozen at the same mark and barely differ between posts, which keeps ERR at 48.9% compared to 14.0% for similar catalog channels — with the feed paused, new posts risk going unnoticed.

What to pay attention to

Views are more uniform than usual (CV ≈ 0.07)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts gain almost the exact same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Psychology & Relationships catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 12,649 to 22,541 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 5
@LeveINext 48.9%
similar channels median 20.8%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 15 to Apr 28. The dashed line is the median (9,357).

05K10KJan 15: 9,705 viewsJan 16: 9,625 viewsJan 16: 9,847 viewsJan 17: 9,446 viewsJan 17: 9,639 viewsJan 19: 9,768 viewsJan 19: 9,718 viewsJan 20: 9,272 viewsJan 20: 9,242 viewsJan 21: 9,437 viewsJan 21: 9,301 viewsJan 22: 9,371 viewsJan 22: 9,719 viewsJan 23: 9,565 viewsJan 23: 9,130 viewsJan 27: 9,608 viewsJan 27: 9,647 viewsJan 28: 9,701 viewsJan 29: 9,625 viewsJan 30: 9,344 viewsJan 31: 9,520 viewsJan 31: 9,669 viewsFeb 1: 9,696 viewsFeb 2: 9,813 viewsFeb 4: 9,174 viewsFeb 5: 8,993 viewsFeb 6: 9,231 viewsFeb 6: 9,237 viewsFeb 9: 8,934 viewsFeb 11: 8,140 viewsFeb 12: 8,276 viewsFeb 13: 8,274 viewsFeb 20: 7,798 viewsFeb 25: 8,513 viewsMar 5: 8,969 viewsMar 7: 8,569 viewsMar 8: 10,053 viewsMar 10: 8,083 viewsMar 12: 8,435 viewsApr 28: 7,373 views Jan 15Apr 28
  • post views
  • median 9,357

Maximum: 10,053 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more uniform than usual (CV ≈ 0.07)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts gain almost the exact same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 79, grade BJun 13Sep 4: index 69, grade CSep 4Oct 4: index 70, grade BOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @LeveINext

What are the verification results for the @LeveINext channel?

The channel has an integrity index of 70 out of 100, a B grade, and a status of "metrics are normal". The analysis revealed an atypically uniform distribution of views across posts and the deletion of some messages (around 27% of IDs are missing).

What reach do the publications show?

With 19,140 subscribers, the median view count is 9,357, yielding an ERR of around 48.9%. This is noticeably higher than the median of similar catalog channels (14.0%), yet there is virtually no variation in views between publications.

Is it advisable to place ads on this channel?

Placement is flagged as questionable. The reason is the lack of activity: the channel has not published posts for over 150 days, and the subscriber count has noticeably declined since the summer.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @LeveINext assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 19,140 subscribers, median post views were 9,357, ERR was 48.9%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.