TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @psyhoIogy

Fake engagement check for @psyhoIogy

Психология отношений — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-19.

Если вы хотите изменить свою реальность, то вы должны изменить своё мышление. 💎 Реклама: @niktwix 📢 Прайс: t.me/newchannel_media/68 🚀 Буст: t.me/psyhoIogy?boost Менеджер: @Spiral_Miya Сотрудничем: @Tgpodbor_official

100/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
98345
Median views
5636
ERR
5.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @psyhoIogy assessment dated 2026-08-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 98,345 subscribers, median post views were 5,636, ERR was 5.7%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 2,819–3,673 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @psyhoIogy

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-19. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @psyhoIogy

Questions about @psyhoIogy

What does grade A+ mean for @psyhoIogy?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @psyhoIogy?

ERR is 5.7%. Median post views equal 5.7% of the channel's 98,345 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 100/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @psyhoIogy