TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mishilovkapsihologa

@mishilovkapsihologa: statistics and cleanliness index

Мышеловка Психолога

4993532519 Владелец : @ValeraRola Менеджеры : @Vadim99TG @Tati_Eventova @tgplix

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-07
Subscribers
21,265
Median views
6,363
ERR
29.9%
Posts sampled
40

Data from 2026-09-07 — 31 days old.

Assessment summary

With a low posting frequency (0.9 posts per day), an advertising post retains top-of-feed visibility for over 24 hours without being pushed down by new content. However, the atypically tight variance in views (CV 0.10) combined with disabled comments indicates likely automated reach stabilization, so advertisers should rely on a conservative engagement forecast.

The 22% rate of deleted posts confirms regular feed cleanups of temporary commercial placements.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.10)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Psychology & Relationships catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 12,649 to 57,805 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 4 of 6
@mishilovkapsihologa 29.9%
similar channels median 18.6%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 23 to Sep 7. The dashed line is the median (6,363).

03.3K6.6KJul 23: 6,409 viewsJul 25: 5,823 viewsJul 26: 5,815 viewsJul 27: 6,412 viewsJul 27: 6,386 viewsJul 28: 6,383 viewsJul 30: 6,377 viewsAug 1: 6,358 viewsAug 2: 5,766 viewsAug 3: 6,369 viewsAug 4: 6,363 viewsAug 5: 6,359 viewsAug 6: 6,374 viewsAug 7: 6,372 viewsAug 8: 6,367 viewsAug 9: 5,754 viewsAug 10: 6,383 viewsAug 11: 6,367 viewsAug 12: 6,376 viewsAug 13: 6,572 viewsAug 14: 6,413 viewsAug 15: 5,777 viewsAug 16: 5,810 viewsAug 18: 6,363 viewsAug 20: 6,390 viewsAug 21: 6,383 viewsAug 22: 5,951 viewsAug 24: 6,414 viewsAug 25: 6,406 viewsAug 26: 6,397 viewsAug 27: 6,353 viewsAug 28: 6,354 viewsAug 30: 5,745 viewsAug 31: 6,147 viewsSep 1: 6,084 viewsSep 2: 5,867 viewsSep 3: 5,644 viewsSep 4: 5,484 viewsSep 6: 4,181 viewsSep 7: 3,300 views Jul 23Sep 7
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 6,363

Maximum: 6,572 views. Data as of Sep 7.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.10)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 13: index 86, grade AJun 13Sep 7: index 70, grade BSep 7

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 3,520–3,961 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @mishilovkapsihologa

Is advertising on this channel justified?

Yes, advertising is considered justified, and the risk score is in the green zone (30 out of 100); however, the advertiser should take into account the disabled reader feedback.

What actual reach will the post get?

The median reach is around 6,360 views per post with an ERR of about 29.9%, and infrequent posting provides the ad with prolonged exposure to the audience without being pushed down.

Are there any technical suspicions regarding audience acquisition?

An abnormally low spread of views (CV 0.10) raises suspicion, which, combined with disabled comments, may indicate background reach boosting or a passive consumption model.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-07
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mishilovkapsihologa assessment dated 2026-09-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 21,265 subscribers, median post views were 6,363, ERR was 29.9%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.