TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Psyuq

Fake engagement check for @Psyuq

Альфия Дайман. Психолог — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-24.

Меня зовут Альфия, я магистр психологии, дипломированный психолог и когнитивно-поведенческий психотерапевт (КПТ). 📌 О чем канал? Объяснения сложных тем. Практические упражнения и техники (КПТ). Главная @ManofHH Менеджер - @tgplix По peклaме: @Diggsa

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-24
Subscribers
5,505
Median views
1,566
ERR
28.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Psychology & Relationships
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Assessment summary

Low view variance (CV 0.17) combined with templated comments from a limited pool of profiles indicates artificial maintenance of the channel's visibility. At the same time, the feed is regularly updated with verbatim reposts of the same posts, and promotional post reach even exceeds regular post reach (1669 vs. 1522 views). Under such conditions, there is a risk of wasting the budget on impressions served to bots rather than a real audience interested in psychology.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 checked Psychology & Relationships channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 19 to 740,589 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 11
28.4% for @Psyuq similar channels median: 14%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 9 of 10
4.31 for @Psyuq similar channels median: 3.33

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-24
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Psyuq assessment dated 2026-09-24 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 5,505 subscribers, median post views were 1,566, ERR was 28.4%, and the cleanliness index was 45/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 1,334–2,086 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 1,669 views versus 1,522 for regular posts — 10% higher.

Based on 6 advertising and 30 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 5 posts.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Comments look artificially inflated (score 90/100)

Mass coordinated artificial engagement with AI/templated comments: different accounts (account #5, #6, account #10, and anonymized accounts) leave parallel remarks with identical introductory phrases ("The hardest part here is that...", "It often happens that...", "The trickiest..."); Direct duplication and cloning of thoughts across different profiles practically word-for-word (for example, identical queries about time management and devaluing someone else's love language); Accounts with one-word filler replies (account #1: "However", "Yeah, right", "Understood", "Good to know") and pseudo-organic illiterate comments (account #3) are present to artificially generate activity volume.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 6 to Sep 24. The dashed line is the median (1,566).

01.1K2.3KJul 6: 1,368 viewsJul 7: 1,265 viewsJul 9: 1,381 viewsJul 11: 1,343 viewsJul 13: 1,357 viewsJul 15: 1,359 viewsJul 16: 1,275 viewsJul 16: 1,261 viewsJul 19: 1,261 viewsJul 22: 1,509 viewsJul 24: 1,380 viewsJul 27: 1,255 viewsJul 28: 1,621 viewsJul 28: 1,552 viewsJul 31: 1,837 viewsAug 3: 1,591 viewsAug 8: 1,630 viewsAug 10: 1,679 viewsAug 10: 1,657 viewsAug 13: 1,535 viewsAug 15: 1,448 viewsAug 17: 1,496 viewsAug 19: 1,586 viewsAug 25: 1,490 viewsAug 27: 1,618 viewsAug 31: 1,676 viewsAug 31: 1,581 viewsSep 3: 1,818 viewsSep 7: 1,244 viewsSep 9: 1,614 viewsSep 13: 1,772 viewsSep 15: 1,966 viewsSep 18: 1,862 viewsSep 19: 1,902 viewsSep 21: 1,717 viewsSep 21: 2,028 viewsSep 23: 2,276 viewsSep 23: 2,023 viewsSep 24: 1,474 viewsSep 24: 913 views Jul 6Sep 24

Maximum: 2,276 views. Data as of Sep 24.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @Psyuq

Data from 2026-09-24 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Psyuq and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Psyuq

Questions about @Psyuq

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is questionable due to the risk of artificial inflation: a deterministic score of 55 out of 100 points to suspicious activity in the comments and overly uniform views.

What real reach will a publication get?

Formally, a post gathers around 1,500–1,600 views, but due to signs of artificial engagement, a significant portion of these views may not come from real people.

What characterizes the channel's audience and content?

The channel covers psychology and relationship breakdowns; however, texts are frequently duplicated in the feed, and the comment thread is sustained by repetitive filler profiles.

Similar channels in Psychology & Relationships

All channels in Psychology & Relationships

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @Psyuq