TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @baseofbusiness

@baseofbusiness: statistics and cleanliness index

Base Of Business

Лучшая база знаний для Вашего бизнеса Менеджер - @sergeywork90

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-05
Subscribers
6,520
Median views
4,106
ERR
63%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Business & startups
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-05 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

A channel offering business management and growth tips, where posts are published rarely, and some messages are missing from the publication numbering — about 51% of IDs are skipped.

Views are virtually identical across all posts and stay at the same level despite audience outflow, making actual reach difficult to predict.

What to pay attention to

Nearly identical views across all posts (CV ≈ 0.04)

Views barely vary from post to post. Usually, the spread is noticeable: some posts get more reads, others fewer.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 34 Business & startups catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,296 to 19,525 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 32 of 34
@baseofbusiness 63%
similar channels median 9.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 22 of 32
@baseofbusiness 0.47
similar channels median 0.77

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Feb 22 to Sep 16. The dashed line is the median (4,106).

02.3K4.5KFeb 22: 4,095 viewsFeb 27: 4,140 viewsFeb 27: 4,059 viewsMar 3: 4,057 viewsMar 5: 4,217 viewsMar 5: 4,376 viewsMar 12: 3,908 viewsMar 13: 4,064 viewsMar 18: 4,319 viewsMar 27: 4,454 viewsMar 31: 4,516 viewsApr 9: 4,254 viewsApr 13: 4,455 viewsApr 24: 4,407 viewsApr 30: 4,029 viewsMay 13: 4,119 viewsMay 14: 4,012 viewsMay 20: 4,154 viewsJun 11: 3,742 viewsJun 12: 4,056 viewsJun 13: 4,290 viewsJun 16: 4,279 viewsJun 18: 4,041 viewsJun 23: 4,061 viewsJun 30: 4,093 viewsJul 12: 4,065 viewsJul 17: 4,117 viewsJul 20: 4,085 viewsJul 22: 4,116 viewsJul 30: 3,980 viewsJul 30: 4,192 viewsAug 11: 4,198 viewsAug 26: 4,096 viewsSep 1: 4,121 viewsSep 7: 3,945 viewsSep 8: 4,179 viewsSep 10: 3,982 viewsSep 10: 4,137 viewsSep 14: 4,018 viewsSep 16: 3,863 views Feb 22Sep 16
  • post views
  • median 4,106

Maximum: 4,516 views. Data as of Oct 5.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Nearly identical views across all posts (CV ≈ 0.04)

Views barely vary from post to post. Usually, the spread is noticeable: some posts get more reads, others fewer.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 13: index 50, grade DJul 13Sep 8: index 50, grade DSep 8Oct 5: index 30, grade FOct 5

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Questions about @baseofbusiness

What purity index was recorded for the channel @baseofbusiness?

The channel's purity index is 30 out of 100, which corresponds to grade F and the "many anomalies" level. The score was influenced by identical view counts across different posts and about 51% of message IDs being skipped.

What reach do the channel's publications get?

The median view count is 4106, and the ERR is 63.0%, which is noticeably higher than the median 9.6% of similar channels in the directory. At the same time, the variance in views between publications is abnormally low.

Is it advisable to place ads in this channel?

Ad placement advisability is considered questionable. Due to anomalies in view metrics and irregular content publishing, it is difficult to determine in advance what actual reach an ad post will receive.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-05
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @baseofbusiness assessment dated 2026-10-05 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,520 subscribers, median post views were 4,106, ERR was 63.0%, and the cleanliness index was 30/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.