TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @volna_trading

@volna_trading: statistics and cleanliness index

Виталий/ Волны в Трейдинге

Делюсь идеями с коротким стопом и большим профит фактором

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
2,565
Median views
3,336
ERR
130.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Trading

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

Views exceed the subscriber count thanks to external traffic from the author's active YouTube channel, while a stable view variation (CV 0.26) confirms the audience's consistent interest in the analytics. Given the extremely low posting frequency (about one post every five days), an advertising message is guaranteed to remain visible for several days without getting washed away by the feed.

The main specific feature is the audience's narrow interest in options and disabled comments, meaning response will depend strictly on the offer's relevance to the trading niche.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 13 Trading catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 588 to 69,410 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 12 of 13
@volna_trading 130.1%
similar channels median 11.9%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 6 of 11
@volna_trading 0.96
similar channels median 0.94

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 31 to Sep 5. The dashed line is the median (3,336).

02.1K4.2KJan 31: 3,457 viewsFeb 8: 3,003 viewsFeb 9: 3,633 viewsFeb 14: 4,003 viewsFeb 21: 3,778 viewsFeb 28: 3,472 viewsMar 7: 3,132 viewsMar 12: 3,059 viewsMar 14: 3,287 viewsMar 21: 3,436 viewsMar 28: 3,652 viewsApr 5: 4,187 viewsApr 11: 3,525 viewsApr 19: 3,547 viewsApr 25: 3,420 viewsMay 2: 3,483 viewsMay 10: 3,580 viewsMay 16: 3,411 viewsMay 23: 3,486 viewsMay 30: 3,476 viewsJun 6: 3,880 viewsJun 10: 3,149 viewsJun 15: 2,913 viewsJun 21: 3,425 viewsJun 23: 3,355 viewsJun 28: 3,402 viewsJul 4: 3,317 viewsJul 11: 3,144 viewsJul 19: 3,014 viewsJul 26: 2,982 viewsAug 1: 2,794 viewsAug 8: 2,435 viewsAug 15: 2,409 viewsAug 19: 2,284 viewsAug 19: 2,224 viewsAug 24: 1,736 viewsAug 29: 1,490 viewsAug 31: 1,347 viewsSep 2: 1,126 viewsSep 5: 784 views Jan 31Sep 5
  • post views
  • median 3,336

Maximum: 4,187 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 100, grade A+Jun 14Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 884–1,175 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @volna_trading

Are there any signs of audience boosting on the channel?

The deterministic check assigned the channel a minimal risk score of 0 out of 100. No view or bot boosting was detected, and subscriber growth dynamics remain smooth.

Why is the post reach higher than the subscriber count?

The median view count is 3,336 with 2,565 subscribers (ERR around 130%). This is typical for channels whose authors redirect traffic from external platforms like YouTube, as well as due to post forwards to trader chats.

Is it worthwhile to place ads on this channel?

Placement is considered justified due to clean metrics and organic reach. The post will receive prolonged visibility due to infrequent posting; however, because comments are disabled, evaluating immediate reader reaction will not be possible.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @volna_trading assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,565 subscribers, median post views were 3,336, ERR was 130.1%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.