Fake engagement check for @bometa4
Форекс • Криптовалюта • Копитрейдинг — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-28.
По всем вопросам пишите: @plutustv
Assessment summary
A reach of over 150% of the subscriber count, combined with high view variance (CV 1.13) and the deletion of 52% of posts, indicates likely external traffic redirection or periodic boosting. Given the feed has been inactive for over 16 days and comments are disabled, ad placement is questionable: the audience may not respond to the publication.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-28
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @bometa4 assessment dated 2026-08-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 623 subscribers, median post views were 946, ERR was 151.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
🚩 Possible scam or deception signals
Publications contain signs of questionable financial schemes: promises of easy money, boosting deposits from 10$ to 200$ in an hour, and an unrealistic trade win rate of up to 95% on binary options.
This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The channel has not published recently. Confirm its next posting date with the administrator.
There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
It appears some posts have been deleted (≈52% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns to conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect sign (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 25 to Aug 12. The dashed line is the median (946).
- post views
- median 946
The sample maximum is 6,320 views. Snapshot dated Aug 28; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: at the time of the check, the channel had no posts newer than one day to compare with older posts.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-28. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @bometa4Questions about @bometa4
What level of boosting risk is determined for this channel?
The channel received a medium risk score of 50/100 due to abnormally high reach (ERR over 150%), view instability, and regular deletion of 52% of publications.
Why is ad placement considered questionable?
The channel has been inactive without new publications for more than 16 days, so ads risk being posted to an inactive feed without receiving proper audience attention.
What reach metrics should be expected from an ad post?
Although the median reach is 946 views with 623 subscribers, strong metric fluctuations (CV 1.13) and disabled comments make performance forecasting unreliable.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.