TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @tradezone_eth

@tradezone_eth: statistics and cleanliness index

Trade🎓Zone

Торгую с 2022 на фьючах Bybit Ежедневная аналитика и точки входа По рекламе: @NikTraderX Менеджер: @BlooKer69 @cryptan_chik

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
52,508
Median views
5,192
ERR
9.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel publishes cryptocurrency market technical analysis, asset charts, and short notes on futures trading.

Over the last four months, the subscriber count has decreased more than fourfold, while views are distributed almost identically across all posts. Given the templated messages in the comments and the deletion of some publications, predicting the actual ad reach is difficult.

What to pay attention to

Comments look templatedscore 96 of 100

  • The vast majority of messages consist of paired mirrored replies: Account #1 sends phrases in English that word-for-word match the meaning of Russian-language comments from other accounts (#2, #3, #4, #6, #9, #11, #12).
  • Account #1 authored almost half of all messages in the sample, systematically translating the remarks of other participants.
  • Comments consist of short templated phrases and monosyllabic reactions.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 10 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 17,670 to 80,509 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 10
@tradezone_eth 9.9%
similar channels median 14.8%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 7 of 9
@tradezone_eth 1.5
similar channels median 0.37

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 14 to Oct 2. The dashed line is the median (5,192).

02.8K5.5KAug 14: 5,105 viewsAug 16: 5,462 viewsAug 17: 5,357 viewsAug 18: 5,187 viewsAug 19: 5,129 viewsAug 20: 5,143 viewsAug 21: 5,185 viewsAug 22: 5,378 viewsAug 23: 5,358 viewsAug 24: 5,076 viewsAug 25: 5,201 viewsAug 26: 5,046 viewsAug 27: 5,196 viewsAug 28: 5,223 viewsAug 28: 5,236 viewsAug 31: 5,115 viewsSep 1: 5,088 viewsSep 2: 5,177 viewsSep 3: 5,236 viewsSep 4: 5,230 viewsSep 7: 5,199 viewsSep 8: 5,336 viewsSep 9: 5,439 viewsSep 10: 5,540 viewsSep 11: 5,454 viewsSep 12: 5,228 viewsSep 14: 5,224 viewsSep 15: 5,414 viewsSep 16: 5,287 viewsSep 17: 5,140 viewsSep 18: 5,152 viewsSep 21: 5,189 viewsSep 22: 5,184 viewsSep 24: 5,021 viewsSep 25: 5,058 viewsSep 28: 5,077 viewsSep 29: 5,511 viewsSep 30: 5,189 viewsOct 1: 4,836 viewsOct 2: 4,641 views Aug 14Oct 2
  • post views
  • median 5,192

Maximum: 5,540 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Nearly identical views across all posts (CV ≈ 0.03)

Views barely differ from post to post. Usually, the spread is noticeable: some posts get read more, others less.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 45, grade DJun 14Aug 17: index 45, grade DAug 17Sep 24: index 45, grade DSep 24Oct 4: index 30, grade FOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

Questions about @tradezone_eth

What is the integrity score of the Trade🎓Zone channel?

The channel's integrity score is 30 out of 100, assigned a grade of F and a level of "many anomalies". The rating was affected by identical view counts across posts, templated discussion activity, and missing publication IDs.

What is the audience engagement on the posts?

The median views are around 5.2k with an ERR of 9.9%. This engagement metric is lower than that of most similar channels in our directory.

Is it worth buying ads on @tradezone_eth?

The feasibility of placement is considered questionable. Due to pronounced anomalies in audience dynamics and view metrics, it is difficult to predict the actual number of publication contacts in advance.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @tradezone_eth assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 52,508 subscribers, median post views were 5,192, ERR was 9.9%, and the cleanliness index was 30/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.