TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @vapechecker

Fake engagement check for @vapechecker

Вейп Чекер 🟢 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-15.

💢Наш бот — это простой способ проверить поставщиков вейп-продукции. Мы оперативно оцениваем надежность, качество товаров и историю поставок. В своей работе мы применяем современные технологии анализа данных и учитываем отзывы реальных пользователей.

98/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
6743
Median views
861
ERR
12.8%
Posts sampled
37
Niche
Other

Evidence snapshot

The @vapechecker assessment dated 2026-08-15 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,743 subscribers, median post views were 861, ERR was 12.8%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 554–1,107 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @vapechecker

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-15. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @vapechecker

Questions about @vapechecker

What does grade A+ mean for @vapechecker?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @vapechecker?

ERR is 12.8%. Median post views equal 12.8% of the channel's 6,743 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 98/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @vapechecker