TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @SaveOnVapes

Fake engagement check for @SaveOnVapes

Vape On Save — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-04.

Только у нас! 💨 Широкий выбор 💰 Доступные цены 🚚 Быстрая доставка ✅ Гарантия качества Связаться с нами: @VapeOnSaveManagers

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
6374
Median views
15982
ERR
250.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Promotions and deals

Evidence snapshot

The @SaveOnVapes assessment dated 2026-08-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,374 subscribers, median post views were 15,982, ERR was 250.7%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 10,582–14,721 views.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @SaveOnVapes

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-04. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @SaveOnVapes

Questions about @SaveOnVapes

What does grade D mean for @SaveOnVapes?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @SaveOnVapes?

ERR is 250.7%. Median post views equal 250.7% of the channel's 6,374 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @SaveOnVapes