TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @VapeOnSavesreviews

@VapeOnSavesreviews: statistics and cleanliness index

Vape On Save ОТЗЫВЫ

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-09
Subscribers
130
Median views
196
ERR
150.8%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Other

Data from 2026-09-09 — 29 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is a dedicated customer review feed for a specific shop with 130 subscribers, where 100% of posts are forwarded customer reports featuring photos of orders. The median of 196 views is driven by customer visits from the main resource rather than regular readers.

Due to the lack of its own engaged audience, placing third-party ads here is not practical.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 19 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (196).

0193386Jul 19: 386 viewsJul 28: 344 viewsJul 30: 318 viewsAug 6: 313 viewsAug 8: 309 viewsAug 9: 305 viewsAug 11: 289 viewsAug 12: 293 viewsAug 12: 298 viewsAug 13: 290 viewsAug 14: 274 viewsAug 15: 274 viewsAug 16: 281 viewsAug 17: 268 viewsAug 19: 241 viewsAug 20: 238 viewsAug 21: 229 viewsAug 21: 227 viewsAug 22: 224 viewsAug 24: 214 viewsAug 26: 175 viewsAug 27: 176 viewsAug 28: 178 viewsAug 29: 169 viewsAug 29: 168 viewsAug 30: 154 viewsAug 30: 159 viewsAug 31: 128 viewsSep 1: 121 viewsSep 2: 95 viewsSep 3: 93 viewsSep 4: 79 viewsSep 5: 68 viewsSep 6: 59 viewsSep 7: 52 viewsSep 8: 43 viewsSep 8: 33 viewsSep 8: 33 viewsSep 8: 33 viewsSep 9: 14 views Jul 19Sep 9
  • post views
  • 4 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 196

Maximum: 386 views. Data as of Sep 9.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 4: index 50, grade DAug 4Sep 9: index 100, grade A+Sep 9

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Mostly reposts and weak reach — little audience of its own.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @VapeOnSavesreviews

Are there any signs of subscriber boosting on the channel?

The deterministic check revealed no signs of artificial inflation (risk score 0/100); however, the subscriber base is extremely small (130 people), so the confidence score remains low.

Why do the views exceed the subscriber count?

The median is 196 views per post, yielding a reach of over 100% of the subscriber base. This is typical for a reviews feed: the link is sent to customers or posted in the main store, so posts are viewed by non-subscribed readers.

Is it worth booking ads on this channel?

Ad placement is considered doubtful. The feed consists entirely of reposted reviews of vape product purchases and lacks an independent audience to promote third-party projects.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @VapeOnSavesreviews assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 130 subscribers, median post views were 196, ERR was 150.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.