TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @VapeOnSavesreviews

Fake engagement check for @VapeOnSavesreviews

Vape On Save ОТЗЫВЫ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-04.

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
118
Median views
221
ERR
187.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Promotions and deals

Evidence snapshot

The @VapeOnSavesreviews assessment dated 2026-08-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 118 subscribers, median post views were 221, ERR was 187.3%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel mostly republishes other sources and has limited reach, so its own engaged audience may be small.

There are not enough posts for a reach forecast.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @VapeOnSavesreviews

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-04. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @VapeOnSavesreviews

Questions about @VapeOnSavesreviews

What does grade D mean for @VapeOnSavesreviews?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @VapeOnSavesreviews?

ERR is 187.3%. Median post views equal 187.3% of the channel's 118 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @VapeOnSavesreviews