TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @BabyBonkEntry

@BabyBonkEntry: statistics and cleanliness index

BabyBonk Portal | Announcement

Official Announcement Channel of BabyBonk! https://twitter.com/babybonkcoin

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-16
Subscribers
7,169
Median views
1,234
ERR
17.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language English 95% of posts
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-16 — 22 days old.

Assessment summary

Official BabyBonk memecoin channel on BNB Chain: announcements for the token and its trading platform BullNBear — partnerships, burns, product updates, almost always with an image and in English.

A post is seen by 17.2% of subscribers — above the median of similar catalog channels (15.0%), and there are more reactions here than in most of them. But the feed has almost stalled: the last post came out 25 days ago, and ad posts get 42% fewer views than regular ones — with such a base, an ad will be seen noticeably worse than a regular project post.

About the channel

Official announcement channel for the BabyBonk memecoin on the BNB Chain: here they write about the token itself and about the BullNBear trading platform, which the team is developing as a separate product. Posts are in English, almost always with an image or infographic, links lead to X and to the BullNBear terminal. The channel has been run for almost three years.

Next to it in the catalog is @iceblockchain: it is several times larger, but it has a lower share of subscribers who see a post (11.4% vs. 17.2% for this channel). @etnovacryptonews has fewer subscribers, but the share of those who saw a post is higher — 35.9%.

What it publishes:

  • BullNBear updates: platform launch, V3 swaps, GitBook, FLAP and FOURMEME integrations.
  • Token burns: reports on burned coins and re-locking of reserves.
  • Partnerships and promotion: announcements of campaigns on Spanish-language channels and a shiller contest with prizes.

The feed is infrequent, posts are published mainly in the evening UTC; some materials are forwards from other crypto channels (“CriptoGemas Calls”, “Monkey's Treasury”, “BSC Daily - Announcements”). By subscriber count, the channel is in the bottom third of its niche. You shouldn't count on a stream of news: the last publication was 25 days ago, and the feed is short promo notes from the project about itself.

By subscribers, it ranks #58 of 83 channels in the Cryptocurrencies niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Third-party spam in comments

The comments look like spam blasts and self-promotion by outside accounts. They are not written on behalf of the channel, and they do not affect the purity index. Moderation or anti-spam in comments would help.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 25 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,680 to 20,995 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 13 of 25
@BabyBonkEntry 17.2%
similar channels median 19.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 21 of 21
@BabyBonkEntry 2.13
similar channels median 0.59

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Nov 5 to Sep 21. The dashed line is the median (1,234).

01.8K3.6KNov 5: 3,575 viewsNov 26: 3,130 viewsDec 26: 2,400 viewsJan 20: 1,970 viewsJan 25: 1,972 viewsJan 30: 1,950 viewsFeb 4: 3,407 viewsFeb 16: 1,758 viewsMar 1: 1,895 viewsMar 12: 1,603 viewsMar 21: 1,285 viewsMar 29: 1,438 viewsMar 31: 1,483 viewsApr 3: 1,601 viewsApr 5: 1,813 viewsMay 11: 1,184 viewsMay 15: 970 viewsMay 17: 1,104 viewsMay 18: 2,761 viewsMay 25: 2,830 viewsJun 1: 3,052 viewsJul 5: 1,410 viewsJul 8: 1,421 viewsJul 31: 1,057 viewsAug 5: 1,034 viewsAug 12: 673 viewsAug 12: 480 viewsAug 12: 585 viewsAug 13: 635 viewsAug 14: 748 viewsAug 16: 1,041 viewsSep 5: 592 viewsSep 6: 536 viewsSep 7: 499 viewsSep 8: 494 viewsSep 8: 577 viewsSep 9: 789 viewsSep 10: 880 viewsSep 19: 613 viewsSep 21: 618 views Nov 5Sep 21
  • post views
  • median 1,234

Maximum: 3,575 views. Data as of Oct 16.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 7: index 96, grade A+Sep 7Oct 16: index 98, grade A+Oct 16

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 814 views versus 1,415 for regular posts — 42% lower.

Based on 4 advertising and 36 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @BabyBonkEntry

Can the metrics of this channel be trusted?

The purity index is 98 out of 100, grade A+, level “metrics are normal”. The check found no deviations that would lower this index.

What share of subscribers sees one post?

ERR — 17.2%: approximately this many subscribers account for the median post. This is above the median of similar catalog channels (15.0%), but about a third of the channels in the group have an even larger share.

Is it worth advertising in this channel?

The feasibility of placement is marked as “controversial”, because the channel has not published posts for a long time. Ad posts here get noticeably fewer views than regular ones, so the reach of an ad may be lower than expected.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-16
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @BabyBonkEntry assessment dated 2026-10-16 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 7,169 subscribers, median post views were 1,234, ERR was 17.2%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.