TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @MSALmgua

@MSALmgua: statistics and cleanliness index

Подслушано МГЮА

Тонкие юридические споры, Московский вайб, исключительно академики @Mgua_slushaetBot предложка Нужна реклама? Пиши в предложку!

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
5,888
Median views
1,759
ERR
29.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Education

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel shows signs of an active student community with organic audience growth from 4,622 to 5,888 subscribers over three months and an even distribution of views.

However, advertising here is questionable due to the high-frequency feed format: with more than 28 posts per day, a post is instantly pushed down by new user submissions and gains reach only during the first few hours.

What to pay attention to

Posts are published at "round" times (62%)

Most publications appear at round minutes, which is a sign of automated scheduled posting. By itself, this is a weak indicator.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Education catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 69 to 477,601 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 10 of 14
@MSALmgua 29.9%
similar channels median 17.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 7 of 13
@MSALmgua 0.63
similar channels median 0.81

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (1,759).

09842KSep 7: 1,938 viewsSep 7: 1,911 viewsSep 7: 1,877 viewsSep 7: 1,949 viewsSep 7: 1,964 viewsSep 7: 1,913 viewsSep 7: 1,899 viewsSep 7: 1,770 viewsSep 7: 1,798 viewsSep 7: 1,744 viewsSep 7: 1,775 viewsSep 7: 1,813 viewsSep 7: 1,850 viewsSep 7: 1,843 viewsSep 7: 1,857 viewsSep 7: 1,918 viewsSep 7: 1,889 viewsSep 7: 1,969 viewsSep 7: 1,939 viewsSep 7: 1,916 viewsSep 8: 1,785 viewsSep 8: 1,724 viewsSep 8: 1,749 viewsSep 8: 1,632 viewsSep 8: 1,607 viewsSep 8: 1,580 viewsSep 8: 1,537 viewsSep 8: 1,557 viewsSep 8: 1,572 viewsSep 8: 1,674 viewsSep 8: 1,576 viewsSep 8: 1,592 viewsSep 8: 1,469 viewsSep 8: 1,172 viewsSep 8: 1,172 viewsSep 8: 1,090 viewsSep 8: 1,050 viewsSep 8: 1,023 viewsSep 8: 585 viewsSep 8: 300 views Sep 7Sep 8
  • post views
  • 22 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,759

Maximum: 1,969 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 16: index 70, grade BJun 16Sep 8: index 96, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 1,568–1,892 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 2 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @MSALmgua

Are there signs of audience manipulation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 4 out of 100, indicating a genuine audience and organic view dynamics without anomalies.

What level of engagement and reach do posts achieve?

The median view count stands at 1,759 per post with 5,888 subscribers, delivering a high ERR of around 29.9%.

Is it reasonable to buy advertising in this channel?

Placement is considered questionable: the feed operates in a continuous-flow mode with a frequency of 28.4 posts per day, causing sponsored posts to quickly shift down and lose visibility.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @MSALmgua assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 5,888 subscribers, median post views were 1,759, ERR was 29.9%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.