TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mosguru

@mosguru: statistics and cleanliness index

Первый Московский

Первый канал о Москве. По рекламе: @mossovet Работаем с @bidfox_news, @Tgpodbor_official, @swaymedia, @Spiral_Yuri Предложить новость: @InboxmskBot РКН: https://clck.ru/3S44Ab

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-25
Subscribers
3,231,299
Median views
53,119
ERR
1.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-25 — 13 days old.

Assessment summary

With a three-million subscriber base and closed comments, only a small fraction of the audience opens posts — the vast majority of users have long stopped reading the feed.

At a pace of around 18 posts per day, an ad message quickly fades out of view, so actual contact with a reader is overly expensive here.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.6% with 3 231 299 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: a post is seen by a small fraction of subscribers. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,111,872 to 4,115,589 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 12 of 12
@mosguru 1.6%
similar channels median 7.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 10
@mosguru 0.5
similar channels median 1.21

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 23 to Sep 25. The dashed line is the median (53,119).

045K89KSep 23: 71,592 viewsSep 23: 77,851 viewsSep 23: 69,125 viewsSep 23: 87,269 viewsSep 23: 85,274 viewsSep 23: 75,578 viewsSep 23: 88,807 viewsSep 23: 89,484 viewsSep 24: 72,935 viewsSep 24: 69,447 viewsSep 24: 79,679 viewsSep 24: 57,241 viewsSep 24: 56,203 viewsSep 24: 53,225 viewsSep 24: 53,206 viewsSep 24: 49,695 viewsSep 24: 53,376 viewsSep 24: 50,532 viewsSep 24: 51,733 viewsSep 24: 53,032 viewsSep 24: 58,242 viewsSep 24: 60,133 viewsSep 24: 64,616 viewsSep 24: 66,150 viewsSep 25: 52,493 viewsSep 25: 49,330 viewsSep 25: 49,638 viewsSep 25: 47,681 viewsSep 25: 45,318 viewsSep 25: 40,634 viewsSep 25: 38,182 viewsSep 25: 37,869 viewsSep 25: 41,886 viewsSep 25: 41,683 viewsSep 25: 41,632 viewsSep 25: 41,729 viewsSep 25: 36,028 viewsSep 25: 22,402 viewsSep 25: 23,923 viewsSep 25: 17,825 views Sep 23Sep 25
  • post views
  • 17 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 53,119

Maximum: 89,484 views. Data as of Sep 25.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.6% with 3 231 299 subscribers

Views are noticeably lower than usual for channels of this size: a post is seen by a small fraction of subscribers. This happens when the audience has lost interest or stopped reading the channel.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 17: index 55, grade CJul 17Aug 17: index 76, grade BAug 17Sep 11: index 55, grade CSep 11Sep 25: index 55, grade CSep 25

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 41,670–56,462 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 3 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 3 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @mosguru

What risk level did the check of @mosguru show?

The channel's risk index is 45 out of 100 (medium level). The channel is verified by Telegram; however, audience activity is concentrated among a small fraction of subscribers.

Is placing ads in this channel justified?

The feasibility of placement is considered questionable due to the low reach of the audience base. With 3.2 million subscribers, a typical post gathers about 53 thousand views, which can make the placement cost overpriced.

What are the actual reach and audience engagement?

Median views stand at 53 119 per post (around 1.6% of subscribers). Only 0.5% of viewers leave reactions, and comments in the feed are disabled.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mosguru assessment dated 2026-09-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 3,231,299 subscribers, median post views were 53,119, ERR was 1.6%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.