TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @top_moskovskiy

Fake engagement check for @top_moskovskiy

Московский район — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-12.

Санкт-Петербург. Жизнь района. События и ЧП. Что? Где? Когда? ✅ Размещение объявлений через ВК: vk.com/msk.piter

83/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
4650
Median views
4
ERR
0.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
News

Evidence snapshot

The @top_moskovskiy assessment dated 2026-08-12 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,650 subscribers, median post views were 4, ERR was 0.1%, and the cleanliness index was 83/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 3–4 views.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @top_moskovskiy

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-12. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @top_moskovskiy

Questions about @top_moskovskiy

What does grade A mean for @top_moskovskiy?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @top_moskovskiy?

ERR is 0.1%. Median post views equal 0.1% of the channel's 4,650 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 83/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @top_moskovskiy