TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @podzemnik_spb

@podzemnik_spb: statistics and cleanliness index

Подземник 👷🏻‍♂️

Связаться с автором 👷🏻‍♂️ https://t.me/Podzemny_bot Всё, что стоит знать о строительстве метрополитена в Санкт-Петербурге Жажда подземелий 🖖🏼 isx23vxgiv1o8pnt

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-21
Subscribers
12,557
Median views
4,413
ERR
35.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-10-21 — 17 days old.

Assessment summary

A detailed chronicle of St. Petersburg metro construction: tunnel boring, excavation pits, station repairs, and discussions of new sections — almost every post has a photo from the construction site.

A post is seen by every third subscriber, and over two months median views grew from 1969 to 4413 with a gain of only 273 subscribers — reach growth is not coming from an influx of audience. There are no ads or forwards in the sample, posts are published roughly once a day, so the post stays in the feed longer than for city news channels with a dozen posts per day.

About the channel

A channel about metro construction in St. Petersburg: what is happening at the Bogatyrskaya, Kamenka, and Bronevaya sites, how the TBMs are progressing, and when new stations will open. It has been run for 4 years 8 months, is written in Russian, and almost every post is a photo from the construction site with a detailed breakdown of the work.

In the catalog, nearby city channels are listed: @piterach and @unknown_piter are larger, @b42coldwar is smaller. At the same time, this channel outperforms each of them in the share of subscribers who see a post: @piterach has ERR 13.9%, @b42coldwar has 11.5%, and @unknown_piter has 2.7%.

What it publishes:

  • Construction progress: reports from sites — excavation of the pit at Bogatyrskaya, diaphragm wall at Kamenka.
  • Tunnel boring: how the Vera, Lyubov, and Nadezhda TBMs are progressing and how much remains until Zastavskaya.
  • Station repairs: major overhaul of Staraya Derevnya, new vestibule at Frunzenskaya, repairs at Obukhovo.
  • Projects and discussions: hearings on the Koltsevaya Line, sites for Farforovskaya and the Arsenalnoye depot.

Posts are published mainly in the afternoon and evening, 85% on weekdays, roughly once a day. There are no forwards from other channels or ads in the sample; tags are #подземник and #санктпетербург. The feed is one or two detailed notes per day with photos from the construction site, without ads or reposts.

By subscribers, it ranks #68 of 92 channels in the News and Media niche of the catalog.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 22 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 4,219 to 37,221 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 19 of 22
@podzemnik_spb 35.1%
similar channels median 14.6%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 18 of 22
@podzemnik_spb 2.62
similar channels median 0.92

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 15 to Oct 20. The dashed line is the median (4,413).

03.1K6.3KSep 15: 3,757 viewsSep 15: 4,006 viewsSep 16: 4,058 viewsSep 16: 4,464 viewsSep 17: 4,914 viewsSep 18: 4,486 viewsSep 20: 4,007 viewsSep 20: 4,121 viewsSep 21: 4,289 viewsSep 21: 4,580 viewsSep 22: 5,042 viewsSep 22: 4,854 viewsSep 23: 4,629 viewsSep 24: 4,906 viewsSep 25: 4,166 viewsSep 25: 4,880 viewsSep 27: 4,262 viewsSep 28: 4,219 viewsSep 28: 4,551 viewsSep 29: 4,363 viewsSep 30: 4,353 viewsSep 30: 5,667 viewsOct 1: 4,649 viewsOct 2: 5,983 viewsOct 2: 6,262 viewsOct 5: 5,047 viewsOct 7: 4,514 viewsOct 8: 5,427 viewsOct 9: 4,578 viewsOct 10: 5,777 viewsOct 12: 4,035 viewsOct 12: 4,101 viewsOct 13: 3,980 viewsOct 13: 4,662 viewsOct 14: 4,009 viewsOct 15: 3,901 viewsOct 16: 4,176 viewsOct 17: 3,867 viewsOct 19: 3,052 viewsOct 20: 2,319 views Sep 15Oct 20
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,413

Maximum: 6,262 views. Data as of Oct 21.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 99, grade A+Jun 14Aug 18: index 100, grade A+Aug 18Oct 21: index 98, grade A+Oct 21

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 2,502–2,869 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @podzemnik_spb

Is the channel clean? Is there any botting here?

The purity index is 98 out of 100, grade A+, level “metrics are normal.” The check found no signals that would lower the index.

What share of subscribers sees one post?

ERR is about 35%: with 12 557 subscribers, median views are 4413. This is higher than for similar channels in the catalog.

Can ads be placed here?

Placement is marked as justified. There were no ad posts in the sample, so ad post reach was not calculated.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-21
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @podzemnik_spb assessment dated 2026-10-21 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 12,557 subscribers, median post views were 4,413, ERR was 35.1%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.