TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @podzemnik_spb

Fake engagement check for @podzemnik_spb

Подземник 👷🏻‍♂️ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-18.

Связаться с автором 👷🏻‍♂️ https://t.me/Podzemny_bot Всё, что стоит знать о строительстве метрополитена в Санкт-Петербурге Жажда подземелий 🖖🏼 isx23vxgiv1o8pnt

100/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
12284
Median views
1969
ERR
16.0%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Other

Evidence snapshot

The @podzemnik_spb assessment dated 2026-08-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 12,284 subscribers, median post views were 1,969, ERR was 16.0%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts are published very frequently, so an advertisement may move down the feed quickly.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,234–1,840 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @podzemnik_spb

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-18. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @podzemnik_spb

Questions about @podzemnik_spb

What does grade A+ mean for @podzemnik_spb?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @podzemnik_spb?

ERR is 16.0%. Median post views equal 16.0% of the channel's 12,284 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 100/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @podzemnik_spb