TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @totsamyiteacher

Fake engagement check for @totsamyiteacher

ТОТ САМЫЙ ПРЕПОД. ГРОО ВИКТОР ЮРЬЕВИЧ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-14.

ВИКТОР ГРОО ▫️Дважды «Педагог года» | 4 школы, не один ВУЗ, IThub колледж и море историй. ▫️Преподаю, делюсь опытом и щедро приправляю все это юмором. Сотрудничество: totsamyiteacher@ya.ru INST: grooviktor_teacher TIKTOK: grooviktor

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-14
Subscribers
1,067
Median views
565
ERR
53.0%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Education
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 months

Assessment summary

Reach exceeding 50% of the subscriber base, combined with a suspiciously flat view distribution (CV 0.25) and a spike of up to 214 paid reactions on a single post, is uncharacteristic of a natural microblog. These signals indicate potential targeted metric boosting, making ad placement questionable: the actual audience engagement and return may turn out lower than the on-screen numbers suggest.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 15 checked Education channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 69 to 465,428 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 12 of 15
53% for @totsamyiteacher similar channels median: 17.5%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 11 of 13
4.81 for @totsamyiteacher similar channels median: 0.81

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-14
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @totsamyiteacher assessment dated 2026-09-14 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,067 subscribers, median post views were 565, ERR was 53.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 283–449 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Spike in paid (Stars) reactions on posts (up to 214 stars)

On certain posts, the number of paid (Stars) reactions is sharply higher than on others—up to 214 stars (≈33% of post views), even though free reactions are also enabled on the channel. This looks like targeted star boosting. Caveat: Telegram counts stars, not unique users—such a spike could also come from a single generous subscriber.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 18 to Sep 14. The dashed line is the median (565).

0467935Jul 18: 446 viewsJul 19: 467 viewsJul 20: 513 viewsJul 23: 632 viewsJul 26: 556 viewsJul 30: 423 viewsJul 30: 477 viewsJul 31: 420 viewsJul 31: 452 viewsAug 2: 399 viewsAug 4: 568 viewsAug 4: 410 viewsAug 7: 568 viewsAug 9: 543 viewsAug 11: 540 viewsAug 14: 537 viewsAug 19: 640 viewsAug 19: 644 viewsAug 19: 439 viewsAug 21: 562 viewsAug 23: 702 viewsAug 23: 709 viewsAug 25: 718 viewsAug 28: 651 viewsSep 1: 755 viewsSep 2: 739 viewsSep 3: 771 viewsSep 4: 672 viewsSep 7: 641 viewsSep 8: 661 viewsSep 8: 935 viewsSep 8: 845 viewsSep 10: 629 viewsSep 10: 674 viewsSep 10: 585 viewsSep 11: 553 viewsSep 13: 424 viewsSep 14: 525 viewsSep 14: 231 viewsSep 14: 260 views Jul 18Sep 14

Maximum: 935 views. Data as of Sep 14.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@totsamyiteacher forwards posts from

Check today: @totsamyiteacher

Data from 2026-09-14 — 6 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @totsamyiteacher and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @totsamyiteacher

Questions about @totsamyiteacher

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable. The channel received a medium risk score (50 out of 100) due to signs of artificial inflation of views and reactions.

What kind of reach do the posts get?

Median reach is 565 views per post with an audience of 1067 subscribers. Views are distributed very evenly across publications, which is rare for a personal blog.

What kind of content is published on the channel?

This is a personal blog of an instructor featuring stories from educational institutions, management case studies, and everyday notes. There are no direct ads for third-party projects in the feed.

Similar channels in Education

All channels in Education

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @totsamyiteacher