TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @aestheticsoflawjob

Fake engagement check for @aestheticsoflawjob

Вакансии для юристов (стажировки, госслужба) — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-15.

Никаких вакансий первичного приёма Предложить вакансию @aestheticsoflaw1_bot Наши каналы: https://telegra.ph/aestheticsoflaw-09-16 Связь @aestheticsoflaw_bot Реклама https://telega.in/c/aestheticsoflawjob Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FJuUW

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-15
Subscribers
16,459
Median views
2,218
ERR
13.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Job Listings
Post language Russian
Channel age 5 years

Assessment summary

The channel maintains consistent views of around 2.2K per post with moderate variance; however, about 40% of posts in the analyzed window have been deleted. Such regular feed cleaning combined with a modest reaction rate (less than half a percent of views) raises doubts about the organic nature of the traffic. For an advertiser, this carries the risk of overpaying for reach that may be partially generated artificially or quickly removed from public access.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Job Listings channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 7,848 to 33,664 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 9
13.5% for @aestheticsoflawjob similar channels median: 7.3%
Reactions per 100 views at the median
0.43 for @aestheticsoflawjob similar channels median: 0.66

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-15
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @aestheticsoflawjob assessment dated 2026-09-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 16,459 subscribers, median post views were 2,218, ERR was 13.5%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

About 1,226–1,598 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 3 more are too fresh.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈40% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is circumstantial (posts are also deleted when editing).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 2 to Sep 15. The dashed line is the median (2,218).

01.6K3.1KSep 2: 2,541 viewsSep 2: 2,577 viewsSep 2: 2,958 viewsSep 2: 2,989 viewsSep 3: 2,937 viewsSep 3: 3,057 viewsSep 4: 3,108 viewsSep 4: 2,783 viewsSep 5: 2,464 viewsSep 5: 2,278 viewsSep 5: 2,685 viewsSep 5: 2,732 viewsSep 6: 2,580 viewsSep 6: 2,584 viewsSep 7: 2,582 viewsSep 7: 2,705 viewsSep 8: 2,702 viewsSep 8: 2,543 viewsSep 9: 2,463 viewsSep 9: 2,522 viewsSep 10: 2,158 viewsSep 10: 2,129 viewsSep 10: 2,032 viewsSep 11: 1,869 viewsSep 11: 1,955 viewsSep 11: 2,115 viewsSep 12: 1,872 viewsSep 12: 1,833 viewsSep 13: 1,745 viewsSep 13: 1,668 viewsSep 13: 1,783 viewsSep 13: 1,730 viewsSep 13: 1,596 viewsSep 14: 1,609 viewsSep 14: 1,569 viewsSep 14: 1,605 viewsSep 14: 1,422 viewsSep 14: 1,244 viewsSep 15: 1,172 viewsSep 15: 226 views Sep 2Sep 15

Maximum: 3,108 views. Data as of Sep 15.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @aestheticsoflawjob

Data from 2026-09-15 — 5 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @aestheticsoflawjob and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @aestheticsoflawjob

Questions about @aestheticsoflawjob

Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?

The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone), and the advisability of placement is marked as questionable. There are suspicions that part of the views is inflated.

What reach should be expected from a post?

The median is about 2,200 views per post (ERR 13.48%). However, due to frequent post deletions, the actual return on an ad post is difficult to predict in advance.

Why is the placement advisability determined as "questionable"?

The reason for this verdict is the risk of view inflation and the deletion of up to 40% of posts from the sample. This makes it impossible to guarantee the authenticity of the reported reach.

Similar channels in Job Listings

All channels in Job Listings

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @aestheticsoflawjob