TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @motivationjurnal

Fake engagement check for @motivationjurnal

Motivational Jóurnal — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-07.

Буст канала: t.me/boost/swandm Канал в РКН: https://clck.ru/3GZKMJ

100/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
7448
Median views
2397
ERR
32.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @motivationjurnal assessment dated 2026-08-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 7,448 subscribers, median post views were 2,397, ERR was 32.2%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts are published very frequently, so an advertisement may move down the feed quickly.

Estimated 48-hour reach: about 1,830 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @motivationjurnal

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-07. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @motivationjurnal

Questions about @motivationjurnal

What does grade A+ mean for @motivationjurnal?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @motivationjurnal?

ERR is 32.2%. Median post views equal 32.2% of the channel's 7,448 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 100/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @motivationjurnal