TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @motivationjurnal

@motivationjurnal: statistics and cleanliness index

Motivational Jóurnal

Буст канала: t.me/boost/swandm Канал в РКН: https://clck.ru/3GZKMJ

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-05
Subscribers
7,079
Median views
7,356
ERR
103.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Celebrities & lifestyle
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-10-05 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

A women's lifestyle channel with short motivational tips, simple recipes, and light workouts.

Despite high post reach, there are almost no reactions: the share of reactions is 0.04% of views, whereas for similar channels in the catalog it hovers around 1.41%, which is why the audience is extremely passive.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.041% of views)

There are views, but almost no reactions. Typically, with such reach, at least someone reacts to posts.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 13 Celebrities & lifestyle catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,381 to 19,843 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 13 of 13
@motivationjurnal 103.9%
similar channels median 25.2%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 12 of 12
@motivationjurnal 0.04
similar channels median 1.65

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 29 to Oct 5. The dashed line is the median (7,356).

03.7K7.4KSep 29: 7,380 viewsSep 29: 7,378 viewsSep 29: 7,373 viewsSep 29: 7,370 viewsSep 30: 6,830 viewsSep 30: 6,868 viewsSep 30: 7,359 viewsSep 30: 7,367 viewsSep 30: 7,383 viewsOct 1: 7,368 viewsOct 1: 7,374 viewsOct 1: 7,345 viewsOct 1: 7,377 viewsOct 1: 7,387 viewsOct 2: 7,355 viewsOct 2: 7,373 viewsOct 2: 7,373 viewsOct 2: 7,361 viewsOct 2: 7,355 viewsOct 3: 7,367 viewsOct 3: 7,362 viewsOct 3: 7,379 viewsOct 3: 7,386 viewsOct 3: 7,360 viewsOct 4: 7,346 viewsOct 4: 7,345 viewsOct 4: 7,357 viewsOct 4: 7,348 viewsOct 4: 7,352 viewsOct 4: 7,338 viewsOct 4: 7,338 viewsOct 4: 7,344 viewsOct 5: 7,162 viewsOct 5: 7,157 viewsOct 5: 7,070 viewsOct 5: 6,937 viewsOct 5: 6,889 viewsOct 5: 6,520 viewsOct 5: 5,708 viewsOct 5: 326 views Sep 29Oct 5
  • post views
  • 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 7,356

Maximum: 7,387 views. Data as of Oct 5.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Aug 7: index 100, grade A+Aug 7Sep 8: index 55, grade CSep 8Oct 5: index 55, grade COct 5

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

About 6,925–7,345 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 6 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @motivationjurnal

What is the integrity index of the Motivational Jóurnal channel?

The integrity index is 55 out of 100 (grade C, "deviations present" level). The main discrepancy is linked to an extremely low share of reactions alongside high reach metrics.

How engaged are subscribers with the content?

Median views exceed the subscriber count (ERR around 103.9%), but only 0.04% of readers leave reactions. There is also no activity in the sampled comments.

Is it worth running ads on this channel?

Ad placement viability is considered questionable due to audience passivity. Although posts formally accumulate reach, readers barely interact with publications.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-05
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @motivationjurnal assessment dated 2026-10-05 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 7,079 subscribers, median post views were 7,356, ERR was 103.9%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.