TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @mosscandal

@mosscandal: statistics and cleanliness index

Полина. Москвичка в декрете

Мама в декрете: от пеленок до гастрономических изысков. Ищу идеальный ресторан, где быстро, вкусно и есть пеленальный столик. Личный блог. Жизнь Москвы, а теперь и Мамы. Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/mosscandal

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
27,049
Median views
8,394
ERR
31%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Kids & Parenting
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

Personal blog of a Moscow mom featuring maternity leave photo chronicles, venue reviews, and children's product recommendations. Over the last three months, the channel's audience has decreased by almost half, while views are almost identical across all posts.

The feed is not overloaded with publications, and sponsored integrations gain only 6% less than regular posts — thanks to the low posting frequency, ads do not drown in the feed.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.11)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts get almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Oct 3. The dashed line is the median (8,394).

04.3K8.7KAug 21: 8,701 viewsAug 21: 8,656 viewsAug 22: 8,670 viewsAug 22: 8,516 viewsAug 24: 8,533 viewsAug 25: 8,509 viewsAug 26: 8,462 viewsAug 27: 8,503 viewsAug 28: 8,386 viewsAug 30: 8,584 viewsAug 30: 8,540 viewsAug 31: 8,535 viewsAug 31: 8,591 viewsSep 1: 8,392 viewsSep 2: 8,456 viewsSep 3: 8,445 viewsSep 4: 8,501 viewsSep 4: 8,396 viewsSep 5: 8,481 viewsSep 6: 8,446 viewsSep 7: 8,483 viewsSep 8: 8,407 viewsSep 9: 8,320 viewsSep 13: 8,113 viewsSep 14: 7,964 viewsSep 15: 8,019 viewsSep 15: 7,942 viewsSep 16: 7,951 viewsSep 17: 8,088 viewsSep 18: 8,008 viewsSep 20: 7,750 viewsSep 21: 8,250 viewsSep 22: 7,983 viewsSep 22: 7,991 viewsSep 27: 6,810 viewsSep 28: 6,717 viewsSep 29: 6,420 viewsSep 30: 6,063 viewsOct 1: 5,691 viewsOct 3: 4,709 views Aug 21Oct 3
  • post views
  • median 8,394

Maximum: 8,701 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.11)

The variance in views between posts is lower than typical for channels (0.15–0.6): posts get almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 24: index 95, grade A+Jun 24Aug 14: index 70, grade BAug 14Sep 24: index 45, grade DSep 24Oct 4: index 70, grade BOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 4,435 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 7,953 views versus 8,445 for regular posts — 6% lower.

Based on 4 advertising and 35 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @mosscandal

What is the purity index of the channel @mosscandal?

The purity index is 70 out of 100 (grade B, "metrics are normal" level). The score was affected by the deletion of about 23% of messages in the sample and the fact that the variance in views between publications is lower than usual.

What reach do sponsored posts get?

A regular post gets about 8.4 thousand views with an ERR of 31.0%. Sponsored integrations attract an average of 7,953 views, lagging behind regular posts by only 6%.

Is placing ads on the channel justified?

The feasibility of ad placement is rated as "justified". The channel publishes fewer than one post per day, the ad load is only 5%, and the reaction-to-view rate (2.71%) is higher than that of most similar channels in the directory.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @mosscandal assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 27,049 subscribers, median post views were 8,394, ERR was 31.0%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.