TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @polyaam

@polyaam: statistics and cleanliness index

МАЛЫШКА ПО

🪽любовь к жизни, комфортный зож, пилатес, жизнь и блогинг! По вопросам рекламы @PRmamonova Инстаграм : @polyaam Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FKk2U

Share this report
Telegram

Grade B metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
28,501
Median views
5,387
ERR
18.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Celebrities & lifestyle

Data from 2026-09-01 — 37 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates active audience engagement with a reaction rate of over 11% of views; however, the variance in views (CV 0.14) borders on suspiciously uniform values.

The main risk factor for an advertiser is the high posting frequency (13.2 posts per day): the message is quickly pushed down by new entries, posing a risk that a standard placement will not achieve long-term reach without being pinned.

What to pay attention to

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.14)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What grade B means

Metrics are mostly normal; one or two weak signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Celebrities & lifestyle catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 9,941 to 62,387 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 10 of 14
@polyaam 18.9%
similar channels median 40.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 13 of 13
@polyaam 11.55
similar channels median 1.48

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 28 to Aug 31. The dashed line is the median (5,387).

03.4K6.8KAug 28: 6,719 viewsAug 28: 6,712 viewsAug 28: 6,775 viewsAug 28: 6,648 viewsAug 28: 6,285 viewsAug 28: 6,412 viewsAug 28: 6,280 viewsAug 28: 6,268 viewsAug 28: 6,237 viewsAug 28: 6,710 viewsAug 28: 6,751 viewsAug 28: 6,571 viewsAug 29: 6,270 viewsAug 29: 6,344 viewsAug 29: 6,384 viewsAug 29: 6,357 viewsAug 29: 6,309 viewsAug 29: 6,301 viewsAug 29: 6,255 viewsAug 30: 5,361 viewsAug 30: 5,324 viewsAug 30: 5,364 viewsAug 30: 5,275 viewsAug 30: 5,286 viewsAug 30: 5,307 viewsAug 30: 5,240 viewsAug 30: 5,231 viewsAug 30: 4,939 viewsAug 30: 5,410 viewsAug 31: 4,958 viewsAug 31: 4,961 viewsAug 31: 4,962 viewsAug 31: 4,949 viewsAug 31: 4,946 viewsAug 31: 4,950 viewsAug 31: 4,946 viewsAug 31: 4,946 viewsAug 31: 4,981 viewsAug 31: 4,050 viewsAug 31: 4,097 views Aug 28Aug 31
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 5,387

Maximum: 6,775 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.14)

Views vary less between posts than is usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts collect almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 20: index 70, grade BJul 20Sep 1: index 70, grade BSep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 4,946–5,286 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @polyaam

What level of fraud risk has been determined for the channel?

The channel received a risk score of 30 out of 100 (green zone), indicating low risk. The only concerning detail is the abnormally uniform distribution of views across posts (CV 0.14).

What is the actual reach and engagement of the posts?

The median reach is about 5.4k views (ERR ~18.9%), and 11.55% of readers leave reactions relative to the number of views, confirming high audience engagement in the personal blog.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

The reason lies in the feed format: with over 13 posts published per day, an ad post quickly gets lost under new content, reducing the effectiveness of the placement without special conditions to keep it at the top.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @polyaam assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 28,501 subscribers, median post views were 5,387, ERR was 18.9%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.