TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @polyaam

Fake engagement check for @polyaam

МАЛЫШКА ПО — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-07-20.

🪽любовь к жизни, комфортный зож, пилатес, жизнь и блогинг! По вопросам рекламы @PRmamonova Инстаграм : @polyaam Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FKk2U

70/100
cleanliness index
Grade B
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
28537
Median views
6119
ERR
21.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @polyaam assessment dated 2026-07-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 28,537 subscribers, median post views were 6,119, ERR was 21.4%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts are published very frequently, so an advertisement may move down the feed quickly.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 5,167–5,299 views.

What grade B means

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

Run a fresh check for @polyaam

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-07-20. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @polyaam

Questions about @polyaam

What does grade B mean for @polyaam?

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

What is the ERR of @polyaam?

ERR is 21.4%. Median post views equal 21.4% of the channel's 28,537 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 70/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @polyaam