TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @reginaitova

Fake engagement check for @reginaitova

Женственность в декрете — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-13.

Жизнь на две страны с двухлеткой — Москва 🇷🇺 и Абу-Даби 🇦🇪 Обзоры мест, кафе, товаров и развлечений Стильные образы мамы и дочки, находки и бьюти Учим английский с нуля вместе Связь: @regina_regi13 По рекламе @pr_SvetlanaK

70/100
cleanliness index
Grade B
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
19843
Median views
4983
ERR
25.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @reginaitova assessment dated 2026-08-13 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 19,843 subscribers, median post views were 4,983, ERR was 25.1%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 3,313–3,987 views.

What grade B means

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

Run a fresh check for @reginaitova

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-13. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @reginaitova

Questions about @reginaitova

What does grade B mean for @reginaitova?

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

What is the ERR of @reginaitova?

ERR is 25.1%. Median post views equal 25.1% of the channel's 19,843 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 70/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @reginaitova