TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @crypto_scalp_signals

Fake engagement check for @crypto_scalp_signals

Crypto Scalp Signals — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-25.

To buy Ads: @Scalp_Support Buy Ad: https://telega.io/c/crypto_scalp_signals

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
30824
Median views
4937
ERR
16.0%
Posts sampled
38
Niche
Cryptocurrencies

Assessment summary

A high share of deleted publications (around 79%) combined with infrequent posting indicates a systematic cleanup of the feed from expired signals and ads. At the same time, a critically low reaction rate (less than 0.1% of views) points to audience passivity, meaning advertisers risk not getting the expected click-throughs even with a median of 4.9k views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypto_scalp_signals assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 30,824 subscribers, median post views were 4,937, ERR was 16.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

The feed contains regular ad integrations for third-party crypto services and recurring promotional inserts for paid signals with template AI illustrations.

This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience appears passive because posts receive very few reactions.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 2,469–4,938 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Only 2 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median. There are 3 advertising posts in total; the rest are less than two days old.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.098% of views)

Views are present, but almost no reactions. This is typical of inflated views: bots "view" posts, but do not react.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 38 posts with views, from Feb 15 to Aug 25. The dashed line is the median (4,937).

04.2K8.4KFeb 15: 4,693 viewsFeb 18: 5,301 viewsFeb 23: 5,557 viewsFeb 25: 6,185 viewsFeb 25: 5,994 viewsMar 4: 5,642 viewsMar 10: 5,441 viewsMar 29: 5,323 viewsMar 29: 4,993 viewsApr 8: 4,885 viewsApr 12: 5,205 viewsApr 17: 4,953 viewsApr 28: 5,074 viewsMay 10: 4,901 viewsMay 17: 7,614 viewsMay 29: 8,414 viewsMay 31: 5,709 viewsJun 3: 5,524 viewsJun 10: 5,086 viewsJun 21: 5,173 viewsJun 21: 4,525 viewsJun 21: 5,187 viewsJul 9: 4,866 viewsJul 10: 4,948 viewsJul 23: 4,747 viewsJul 23: 4,927 viewsJul 29: 4,590 viewsJul 30: 4,788 viewsAug 6: 4,640 viewsAug 7: 4,692 viewsAug 7: 4,701 viewsAug 13: 4,283 viewsAug 15: 4,588 viewsAug 16: 4,573 viewsAug 18: 4,408 viewsAug 20: 4,565 viewsAug 22: 4,516 viewsAug 25: 1,852 views Feb 15Aug 25

The sample maximum is 8,414 views. Snapshot dated Aug 25; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.

The view-dispersion and maturation signals were available and found no deviations. This is not a guarantee: use the complete cleanliness index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.

Run a fresh check for @crypto_scalp_signals

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-25. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Buy advertising

The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.

TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.

Where to buy advertising

These are affiliate links: TG Inspector may receive a commission. This does not affect the cleanliness index.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @crypto_scalp_signals

Questions about @crypto_scalp_signals

What is the fraud risk for the Crypto Scalp Signals channel?

The channel has a moderate risk score (50/100) with low analysis confidence. The main red flags are the deletion of about 79% of publications and an extremely low reaction rate relative to views.

What audience activity can be expected from a post?

Median views stand at around 4,937 (ERR 16.02%), but only 0.10% of readers leave reactions, indicating high audience passivity.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to weak reader engagement, infrequent posting, and regular feed cleanups.

Similar channels in Cryptocurrencies

All channels in Cryptocurrencies

Other checked channels

@yuriifrost@infokrasot@mskchpa@onlineodds1@realmadrid_aficcionados@binanceredpacket_code@earn_tips@sky_sports_football_updates@pavlovstars@adsgram_ai@tradingkattadubai@xdrawking09

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @crypto_scalp_signals