TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @crypto_scalp_signals

@crypto_scalp_signals: statistics and cleanliness index

Crypto Scalp Signals

To buy Ads: @Scalp_Support Buy Ad: https://telega.io/c/crypto_scalp_signals

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-25
Subscribers
30,824
Median views
4,937
ERR
16%
Posts sampled
38
Niche Cryptocurrencies

Data from 2026-08-25 — 46 days old.

Assessment summary

A high share of deleted publications (around 79%) combined with infrequent posting indicates a systematic cleanup of the feed from expired signals and ads.

At the same time, a critically low reaction rate (less than 0.1% of views) points to audience passivity, meaning advertisers risk not getting the expected click-throughs even with a median of 4.9k views.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.098% of views)

Posts get views but almost no reactions. With this reach, someone usually reacts.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

The feed contains regular ad integrations for third-party crypto services and recurring promotional inserts for paid signals with template AI illustrations.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 11,112 to 80,065 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 14
@crypto_scalp_signals 16%
similar channels median 15.2%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 13
@crypto_scalp_signals 0.1
similar channels median 0.62

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 38 posts with views, from Feb 15 to Aug 25. The dashed line is the median (4,937).

04.2K8.4KFeb 15: 4,693 viewsFeb 18: 5,301 viewsFeb 23: 5,557 viewsFeb 25: 6,185 viewsFeb 25: 5,994 viewsMar 4: 5,642 viewsMar 10: 5,441 viewsMar 29: 5,323 viewsMar 29: 4,993 viewsApr 8: 4,885 viewsApr 12: 5,205 viewsApr 17: 4,953 viewsApr 28: 5,074 viewsMay 10: 4,901 viewsMay 17: 7,614 viewsMay 29: 8,414 viewsMay 31: 5,709 viewsJun 3: 5,524 viewsJun 10: 5,086 viewsJun 21: 5,173 viewsJun 21: 4,525 viewsJun 21: 5,187 viewsJul 9: 4,866 viewsJul 10: 4,948 viewsJul 23: 4,747 viewsJul 23: 4,927 viewsJul 29: 4,590 viewsJul 30: 4,788 viewsAug 6: 4,640 viewsAug 7: 4,692 viewsAug 7: 4,701 viewsAug 13: 4,283 viewsAug 15: 4,588 viewsAug 16: 4,573 viewsAug 18: 4,408 viewsAug 20: 4,565 viewsAug 22: 4,516 viewsAug 25: 1,852 views Feb 15Aug 25
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,937

Maximum: 8,414 views. Data as of Aug 25.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

About 2,291–4,580 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @crypto_scalp_signals

What is the fraud risk for the Crypto Scalp Signals channel?

The channel has a moderate risk score (50/100) with low analysis confidence. The main red flags are the deletion of about 79% of publications and an extremely low reaction rate relative to views.

What audience activity can be expected from a post?

Median views stand at around 4,937 (ERR 16.02%), but only 0.10% of readers leave reactions, indicating high audience passivity.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to weak reader engagement, infrequent posting, and regular feed cleanups.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @crypto_scalp_signals assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 30,824 subscribers, median post views were 4,937, ERR was 16.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.