Fake engagement check for @rtf_221

ريتا كابوس | الرسمي — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-25.

⚜️ ريتا كابوس | الرسمي ⚜️ 👤 الإدارة: @R_8_61 🛡️ دلائل الثقة: @rtf_100a 💬 سوبر الدردشة: @SuperKapos ✨ وجهتكم لكل جديد وحصري. 🤝 الاحترام أساس التعامل. 🤍 نورتوا القناة. 🔗 t.me/rtf_221

55 /100

Grade C some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-25

Subscribers: 131,650
Median views: 1,696
ERR: 1.3%
Posts sampled: 40

Niche Video Games

Post language Arabic

Channel age 2 years

Assessment summary

The audience is barely engaged: with 24 posts per day, posts are pushed down instantly, while closed comments and minimal reactions indicate a burnt-out or passive base.

Placing ads here is questionable, as the ad will quickly get lost among the constant stream of commercial posts and will not receive sustained attention.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 44,733 to 380,976 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 11 of 11

1.3% for @rtf_221 similar channels median: 20.3%

Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 10

0.35 for @rtf_221 similar channels median: 2.17

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-25
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @rtf_221 assessment dated 2026-09-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 131,650 subscribers, median post views were 1,696, ERR was 1.3%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed consists predominantly of repetitive commercial listings for the sale of gaming accounts and channels.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 1,100–2,068 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade C means

Some metrics are worrying: views may be partly inflated or the audience passive. Be careful with ads.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.3% with 131,650 subscribers

Views are noticeably below the norm for a channel of this size. The audience has low activity — possibly partially burnt out or with a share of inactive subscribers. This alone does not yet prove inflated numbers.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 23 to Sep 25. The dashed line is the median (1,696).

post views
23 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
median 1,696

Maximum: 4,089 views. Data as of Sep 25.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 1.3% with 131,650 subscribers

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @rtf_221

Data from 2026-09-25 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @rtf_221 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @rtf_221

Questions about @rtf_221

What level of risk has been identified for this channel?

The channel received a moderate risk score of 45 out of 100 in the yellow zone. The main risk factor is the extremely low audience activity relative to the total number of subscribers.

Why is ad placement here considered questionable?

Only a small fraction of subscribers view the posts (ERR around 1.3%), and with a steady stream of more than 20 posts per day, the ad will quickly disappear from view.

What reach can be expected upon publication?

The median reach is about 1.7 thousand views per post, with less than half a percent of readers leaving reactions, and comments are disabled.