TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @mods_brawls

Fake engagement check for @mods_brawls

Браво Старс последняя версия (Brawl Stars) — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-07-29.

Браво Старс и Nulls Brawl 68.250 последней версии 2026. Скачать обновление популярных модов Бравл Старс (v68.250) с Нори и Венди и приватных серверов - https://brawlstars-android.ru

95/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
61441
Median views
19622
ERR
31.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Other

Evidence snapshot

The @mods_brawls assessment dated 2026-07-29 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 61,441 subscribers, median post views were 19,622, ERR was 31.9%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 13,402–14,690 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @mods_brawls

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-07-29. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @mods_brawls

Questions about @mods_brawls

What does grade A+ mean for @mods_brawls?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @mods_brawls?

ERR is 31.9%. Median post views equal 31.9% of the channel's 61,441 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 95/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @mods_brawls