Fake engagement check for @greenpubg

One Green Apple Live — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-06.

ЕСЛИ НЕ ЗАХОДИТ ПО ССЫЛКЕ НАЖМАЙ НА 3 ТОЧКИ С ПРАВА СВЕРХУ, И ЖМИ 'ОТКРЫТЬ В БРАУЗЕРЕ' 🍏 Для связи: @ONEGREENAPPLE_UC 🍏 Магазин: @metro_shop_onegreenapple 🍏 Отправить донат: https://t.me/greenpubg/4141 РКН № 7751050401: https://clck.ru/3V32nu

50 /100

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-06

Subscribers: 11,920
Median views: 545
ERR: 4.6%
Posts sampled: 33

Niche Video Games

Assessment summary

Low audience engagement with nearly 12,000 subscribers is typical for gaming streamer channels, where a significant portion of users subscribed for temporary giveaways and eventually stopped reading the feed. About 44% deleted posts are most likely related to clearing past streams or temporary ad integrations, which masks the true attention retention history. At a posting rate of over 15 publications per day, an advertisement will quickly get lost in the stream of gaming screenshots, so one should rely solely on the core reach of 500–550 views.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 4,111 to 21,205 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 8

4.6% for @greenpubg similar channels median: 23.4%

Reactions per 100 views lower than 5 of 8

1.58 for @greenpubg similar channels median: 2.7

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-06
Sample: The latest 33 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @greenpubg assessment dated 2026-09-06 uses 33 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 11,920 subscribers, median post views were 545, ERR was 4.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 393–568 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 6 more are too fresh.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈44% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts are also deleted during edits).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 33 posts with views, from Sep 4 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (545).

post views
16 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
median 545

Maximum: 758 views. Data as of Sep 6.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @greenpubg

Data from 2026-09-06 — 14 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @greenpubg and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @greenpubg

Questions about @greenpubg

How risky is it to buy ads in this channel?

The channel has a medium risk score (50/100). The main risk factors are a low share of active readers relative to the subscriber base and the deletion of about 44% of recent publications.

What reach performance can be expected from a publication?

The median reach is about 545 views. At a posting frequency of more than 15 posts per day, a publication quickly loses visibility in the feed, so exposure will only be secured with active, regular stream viewers.

Why is the feasibility of ad placement assessed as questionable?

Ad placement is questionable because posts are viewed by a small fraction of the audience (ERR around 4.6%). Buying ads priced for the entire 12,000 subscriber base cannot be considered cost-effective — the placement should be evaluated solely on the actual reach of 500–550 views.