TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @bitcoin_boy_tejal

@bitcoin_boy_tejal: statistics and cleanliness index

Bitcoin Signals Trading News

@brand_godara Get All Updates About Crypto Market ✅ Trending KuCoin/Binance Coins name ✅ Daily Crypto Pumps Signals 🏆 Buy ads https://telega.io/c/bitcoin_boy_tejal

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-11-04
Subscribers
21,802
Median views
27,042
ERR
124%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Cryptocurrencies
Post language English
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-11-04 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

«Bitcoin Signals Trading News» is a feed about bitcoin and the crypto market: news, infographics and memes in English, almost all of it images with a short caption, roughly once every five days. The channel has been running for three years, but some messages have been deleted from the feed: about 31% of the numbers are missing.

By the share of subscribers who see a post, the channel differs sharply from similar ones: ERR 124% against 13.3% for them, and no channel in the group is higher. Reactions are almost absent: 0.00% of views against 0.62% for similar channels, and that is cited as the reason for the disputed placement: the audience is passive. Median views across three measurements barely moved (from 27.6 to 27.0 thousand), and subscribers fell by more than a thousand.

About the channel

A channel about bitcoin and the crypto market: news, infographics and memes in English. It has been running for three years, almost every post is an image with a short caption, sometimes video.

In the catalog it sits next to @market_crypto_bitcoin and @cryptomarketintelhq, channels on the same topic and of similar size. The first has slightly fewer subscribers, but a larger share of them see a post (ERR 138.9% against 124.0%); the second has fewer subscribers and a lower share. @cryptoassetreport is about five times larger, but a noticeably smaller share of its subscribers sees a post.

What it publishes:

  • Market news: short briefs like «BlackRock sold $1.01 billion in BTC in a week».
  • Comparisons and infographics: bitcoin returns versus gold, the S&P 500 and tech ETFs since the start of the war with Iran.
  • Memes: «Bitcoin 60K in 2021 and in 2026», images about how holders feel.
  • Large holders: a breakdown of who holds how much BTC, from Satoshi to BlackRock and the US government.

Posts mostly go out on weekdays and during the day (55% of posts between 12:00 and 18:00 UTC), about once every five days. There are no forwards from other channels; ads make up 2% of the sample. The feed is short and sparse: one-minute notes with an image, no long breakdowns.

By subscribers, it ranks #35 of 83 channels in the Cryptocurrencies niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.004% of views)

Views are there, reactions almost aren't. At that kind of reach at least someone usually reacts to posts.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 21 Cryptocurrencies catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 8,709 to 52,026 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 20 of 21
@bitcoin_boy_tejal 124%
similar channels median 15.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 16 of 16
@bitcoin_boy_tejal 0
similar channels median 0.58

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Feb 16 to Nov 3. The dashed line is the median (27,042).

023K46KFeb 16: 40,104 viewsFeb 20: 33,823 viewsFeb 23: 27,096 viewsMar 4: 27,392 viewsMar 5: 24,654 viewsMar 11: 31,630 viewsMar 16: 25,373 viewsMar 19: 19,042 viewsMar 30: 22,837 viewsApr 9: 32,353 viewsApr 12: 1,476 viewsApr 13: 33,170 viewsApr 17: 37,750 viewsApr 20: 38,615 viewsApr 27: 37,836 viewsApr 29: 40,333 viewsMay 3: 45,545 viewsMay 20: 15,013 viewsMay 25: 29,029 viewsMay 27: 22,779 viewsJun 2: 23,526 viewsJun 9: 25,201 viewsJun 25: 26,989 viewsJul 3: 20,004 viewsJul 11: 27,749 viewsJul 14: 25,691 viewsJul 18: 27,120 viewsJul 22: 28,668 viewsJul 27: 28,170 viewsJul 30: 19,310 viewsAug 3: 16,081 viewsAug 27: 27,836 viewsAug 29: 27,488 viewsSep 9: 19,531 viewsSep 22: 26,339 viewsSep 30: 24,425 viewsOct 1: 17,947 viewsOct 15: 27,881 viewsOct 18: 18,502 viewsNov 3: 7,251 views Feb 16Nov 3
  • post views
  • median 27,042

Maximum: 45,545 views. Data as of Nov 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Elevated reach: ERR ≈ 124%

On a large channel, views come close to the subscriber count or exceed it. That can be normal for viral content, but it warrants attention.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 10: index 55, grade CSep 10Oct 4: index 55, grade COct 4Nov 4: index 55, grade CNov 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

About 10,989–21,978 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @bitcoin_boy_tejal

What does the purity index of 55/100 mean for this channel?

It is grade C, level «there are deviations». The index was lowered by views without reactions and by the deleted portion of messages in the feed.

Do more people see a post than are subscribed to the channel?

Yes, ERR is about 124%: views are roughly equal to the subscriber count, and even higher. Where those views come from is not visible in our data.

Can ads be placed here?

The placement is flagged as disputed. The reason is a passive audience: reactions make up 0.00% of views, while for similar channels in the catalog it is 0.62%.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-11-04
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @bitcoin_boy_tejal assessment dated 2026-11-04 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 21,802 subscribers, median post views were 27,042, ERR was 124.0%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.