📭 @TGEAGLE1BOT Ads: https://telega.io/c/Earn_tips Ads: https://adsly.me/@money_networks
Assessment summary
An extremely low view variance (CV 0.08), combined with the deletion of about 72% of publications and disabled comments, points to likely simulated activity and periodic feed cleanups of ads. Given the low posting frequency (less than one post per day), buying ad integrations carries the risk of paying for artificial traffic instead of genuine attention from real crypto enthusiasts.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Earn_tips assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 11,486 subscribers, median post views were 3,792, ERR was 33.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
⚠️ Mixed content signals
The feed contains promotional materials for crypto casinos, referral airdrop bots, and third-party service promotions.
This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 3,116–3,387 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Only 1 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.08)
The view variance between posts is noticeably lower than normal for an organic channel (typically 0.15–0.6). Partial boosting is possible.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from May 15 to Aug 21. The dashed line is the median (3,792).
- post views
- median 3,792
The sample maximum is 4,316 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.08)
The view variance between posts is noticeably lower than normal for an organic channel (typically 0.15–0.6). Partial boosting is possible.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: at the time of the check, the channel had no posts newer than one day to compare with older posts.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @Earn_tipsQuestions about @Earn_tips
What level of boosting risk has been determined for this channel?
The channel received a medium risk score (50 out of 100) due to unnaturally uniform views across posts and the deletion of over 70% of messages from the feed.
What are the actual audience engagement metrics?
Formal reach is around 33% (3,792 views per post), but comments are disabled, making it impossible to evaluate genuine subscriber reactions.
Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?
Placement is considered questionable, as metrics point to potential artificial views and the advertising impact may be unpredictable.
Similar channels in Cryptocurrency
- 100 · A+
- 95 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
All channels in Cryptocurrency
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.