TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Earn_tips

Fake engagement check for @Earn_tips

AI Trading Signals 4 Free — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-26.

📭 @TGEAGLE1BOT Ads: https://telega.io/c/Earn_tips Ads: https://adsly.me/@money_networks

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
11486
Median views
3792
ERR
33.0%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

An extremely low view variance (CV 0.08), combined with the deletion of about 72% of publications and disabled comments, points to likely simulated activity and periodic feed cleanups of ads. Given the low posting frequency (less than one post per day), buying ad integrations carries the risk of paying for artificial traffic instead of genuine attention from real crypto enthusiasts.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-26
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Earn_tips assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 11,486 subscribers, median post views were 3,792, ERR was 33.0%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

The feed contains promotional materials for crypto casinos, referral airdrop bots, and third-party service promotions.

This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 3,116–3,387 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Only 1 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What to pay attention to

Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.08)

The view variance between posts is noticeably lower than normal for an organic channel (typically 0.15–0.6). Partial boosting is possible.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 15 to Aug 21. The dashed line is the median (3,792).

02.2K4.3KMay 15: 3,509 viewsMay 15: 3,515 viewsMay 17: 3,670 viewsMay 19: 2,894 viewsMay 20: 3,075 viewsMay 22: 3,092 viewsMay 22: 4,167 viewsMay 24: 4,005 viewsMay 25: 4,104 viewsMay 25: 4,115 viewsMay 26: 4,290 viewsMay 29: 4,001 viewsMay 30: 4,132 viewsMay 31: 3,978 viewsJun 4: 3,981 viewsJun 4: 4,048 viewsJun 6: 4,316 viewsJun 12: 3,995 viewsJun 14: 3,792 viewsJun 15: 3,778 viewsJun 16: 3,889 viewsJun 18: 3,917 viewsJun 20: 3,873 viewsJun 23: 3,736 viewsJun 25: 3,783 viewsJun 26: 3,822 viewsJun 29: 3,437 viewsJul 2: 3,884 viewsJul 5: 3,898 viewsJul 12: 3,834 viewsJul 16: 3,792 viewsJul 23: 3,710 viewsJul 25: 3,732 viewsJul 30: 3,749 viewsAug 3: 3,718 viewsAug 8: 3,720 viewsAug 12: 3,653 viewsAug 15: 3,626 viewsAug 20: 3,495 viewsAug 21: 3,570 views May 15Aug 21

The sample maximum is 4,316 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Suspiciously uniform views (CV ≈ 0.08)

The view variance between posts is noticeably lower than normal for an organic channel (typically 0.15–0.6). Partial boosting is possible.

What could not be calculated

View maturation was not assessed: at the time of the check, the channel had no posts newer than one day to compare with older posts.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.

Run a fresh check for @Earn_tips

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Buy advertising

The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.

TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.

These are affiliate links: TG Inspector may receive a commission. This does not affect the cleanliness index.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @Earn_tips

Questions about @Earn_tips

What level of boosting risk has been determined for this channel?

The channel received a medium risk score (50 out of 100) due to unnaturally uniform views across posts and the deletion of over 70% of messages from the feed.

What are the actual audience engagement metrics?

Formal reach is around 33% (3,792 views per post), but comments are disabled, making it impossible to evaluate genuine subscriber reactions.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable, as metrics point to potential artificial views and the advertising impact may be unpredictable.

Similar channels in Cryptocurrency

All channels in Cryptocurrency

Other checked channels

@onlineodds1@realmadrid_aficcionados@binanceredpacket_code@sky_sports_football_updates@pavlovstars@crypto_scalp_signals@adsgram_ai@tradingkattadubai@xdrawking09@primer_league_match_goal@betting_mikekawakubettz@eyob_tech

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @Earn_tips