Dm-@fuckrespa,
checked 2026-09-09
- Subscribers
- 1,104
- Median views
- 537
- ERR
- 48.6%
- Posts sampled
- 37
Assessment summary
The deletion of nearly 98% of publications from the channel's history, combined with a high variance in views (CV 0.82), points to unstable or artificially inflated traffic. With just over 1,100 subscribers, the channel maintains a reach of around 537 views; however, an extremely low reaction rate (0.50% of views) confirms that audience engagement is low, and promotional posts risk not getting the expected response.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 8 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 639 to 3,040 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-09
- Sample
- The latest 37 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Atermalny_Km assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,104 subscribers, median post views were 537, ERR was 48.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
🚩 Possible scam or deception signals
The feed contains suspicious offers selling schemes and accounts via direct messages, as well as giveaways requiring spam distribution across third-party chats.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 269–537 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 37.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈98% missing in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is circumstantial (posts can also be deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 37 posts with views, from Jul 25 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (537).
- post views
- 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 537
Maximum: 3,253 views. Data as of Sep 9.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@Atermalny_Km's posts are forwarded by
Only among channels we have checked.
Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @Atermalny_Km and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @Atermalny_KmQuestions about @Atermalny_Km
What level of manipulation risk was detected for the channel?
The channel has a medium risk level (score 50 out of 100). The audit revealed signs of partial view boosting, high irregularity in reach, and the deletion of the vast majority of previously published posts.
What is the real reach of publications in this channel?
The median reach is 537 views with a base of 1,104 subscribers. However, due to unstable metric variance (CV 0.82), the actual reach of an individual post may significantly deviate from the median.
Is it advisable to buy ads on the Atermalny channel?
Ad placement is considered questionable. There is a risk that some views are artificial, and clearing the post history makes it difficult to assess the actual long-term return on integrations.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.