TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @iPapkorn

@iPapkorn: statistics and cleanliness index

🌐 https://ipapkorn.github.io Your movie recommendation system. Place Ad: https://telega.io/c/iPapkorn

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-07
Subscribers
1,864,703
Median views
53,431
ERR
2.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Movie
Post language English
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-10-07 — 31 days old.

Assessment summary

An English-language channel featuring trailers, posters, and film industry news that has been running for over five years.

Posts are seen by a small portion of the audience: an ERR of 2.9% falls behind 24 out of 26 similar channels in the directory, and over the past two weeks, median views dropped from 62k to 53k. In addition, eight mature posts picked up views simultaneously, so with an audience of nearly two million people, actual reach remains low.

What to pay attention to

Old posts picked up views all at once (+4.1% per day)

Since the last check, views on 8 already mature posts have grown almost identically—all of them gained views, not just select successful ones. Typically, a post gains the bulk of its views within the first two days, after which views accumulate unevenly.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 29 Movie catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 287 to 266,736 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 27 of 29
@iPapkorn 2.9%
similar channels median 16.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 26 of 27
@iPapkorn 0.14
similar channels median 0.87

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 11 to Oct 7. The dashed line is the median (53,431).

044K88KSep 11: 85,865 viewsSep 11: 87,881 viewsSep 13: 79,042 viewsSep 13: 82,334 viewsSep 15: 71,390 viewsSep 15: 71,001 viewsSep 16: 84,020 viewsSep 17: 61,845 viewsSep 18: 68,192 viewsSep 18: 71,706 viewsSep 20: 69,468 viewsSep 21: 65,946 viewsSep 22: 62,916 viewsSep 22: 60,902 viewsSep 23: 69,867 viewsSep 23: 74,482 viewsSep 24: 65,430 viewsSep 25: 70,483 viewsSep 26: 59,263 viewsSep 27: 52,616 viewsSep 28: 54,246 viewsSep 28: 47,714 viewsSep 28: 51,894 viewsSep 29: 48,591 viewsSep 29: 52,104 viewsOct 1: 46,963 viewsOct 1: 47,735 viewsOct 1: 48,428 viewsOct 2: 52,420 viewsOct 3: 37,124 viewsOct 4: 28,661 viewsOct 5: 25,675 viewsOct 5: 25,000 viewsOct 5: 26,138 viewsOct 6: 22,497 viewsOct 6: 19,627 viewsOct 6: 14,910 viewsOct 7: 10,221 viewsOct 7: 6,145 viewsOct 7: 6,066 views Sep 11Oct 7
  • post views
  • 4 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 53,431

Maximum: 87,881 views. Data as of Oct 7.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Old posts picked up views all at once (+4.1% per day)

Since the last check, views on 8 already mature posts have grown almost identically—all of them gained views, not just select successful ones. Typically, a post gains the bulk of its views within the first two days, after which views accumulate unevenly.

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.9%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. This might be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 20: index 90, grade ASep 20Oct 7: index 50, grade DOct 7

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 23,675–47,349 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @iPapkorn

What purity index is assigned to the @iPapkorn channel?

The channel has a purity index of 50 out of 100, a D grade, and an "anomalies detected" level. This score was influenced by low audience reach and the simultaneous gain of views on previously published posts.

What share of the audience do posts reach?

With a base of over 1.8 million subscribers, the median view count is around 53 thousand, which translates to an ERR of approximately 2.9%. For 24 out of 26 similar channels in the directory, this share is noticeably higher.

Is it worth running ads on this channel?

The viability of ad placement is considered questionable: posts are seen by only a small fraction of subscribers. Furthermore, comments are disabled on posts, and reaction engagement remains at 0.14% of views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-07
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @iPapkorn assessment dated 2026-10-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,864,703 subscribers, median post views were 53,431, ERR was 2.9%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.