TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @kino_hd2

@kino_hd2: statistics and cleanliness index

ФИЛЬМЫ КИНО СЕРИАЛЫ

Все материалы размещены по партнёрской програме ivi.ru № 4963743270 менеджер по рекламе: @kuzr103 купить рекламу можно тут: https://telega.in/c/kino_hd2 Администрация не несёт отвественности за рекламу. Будьте внимательны.

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-26
Subscribers
1,079,215
Median views
4,466
ERR
0.4%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Movie
Post language Russian
Channel age 6 years

Data from 2026-09-26 — 12 days old.

Assessment summary

With a subscriber base exceeding one million people, posts are read by only a tiny fraction of a percent, and over the past three months, more than 124 thousand subscribers have unsubscribed from the channel.

More than a third of posts in the feed are deleted, making the ad reach forecast extremely unreliable, and relying on the million-strong audience pointless.

What to pay attention to

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.4% with 1 079 215 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible portion of the audience. Subscribers are present, but views are almost nonexistent.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed is dominated by direct and affiliate advertising, including promo codes for online cinemas and gambling promotions.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 26 Movie catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 849 to 242,651 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 26 of 26
@kino_hd2 0.4%
similar channels median 19%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 23 of 24
@kino_hd2 0.1
similar channels median 0.43

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 23 to Sep 26. The dashed line is the median (4,466).

03.7K7.3KSep 23: 6,381 viewsSep 23: 6,824 viewsSep 23: 6,537 viewsSep 23: 5,947 viewsSep 23: 5,855 viewsSep 23: 5,976 viewsSep 23: 5,684 viewsSep 23: 7,340 viewsSep 24: 6,578 viewsSep 24: 5,941 viewsSep 24: 5,689 viewsSep 24: 5,305 viewsSep 25: 5,556 viewsSep 25: 5,559 viewsSep 25: 5,656 viewsSep 25: 5,309 viewsSep 25: 5,352 viewsSep 25: 5,954 viewsSep 25: 4,695 viewsSep 25: 4,630 viewsSep 25: 3,966 viewsSep 25: 4,012 viewsSep 25: 4,284 viewsSep 25: 4,303 viewsSep 25: 4,236 viewsSep 25: 4,286 viewsSep 26: 3,032 viewsSep 26: 2,975 viewsSep 26: 3,012 viewsSep 26: 3,277 viewsSep 26: 3,127 viewsSep 26: 2,829 viewsSep 26: 2,058 viewsSep 26: 2,218 viewsSep 26: 949 viewsSep 26: 915 viewsSep 26: 918 viewsSep 26: 918 viewsSep 26: 913 viewsSep 26: 247 views Sep 23Sep 26
  • post views
  • 15 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,466

Maximum: 7,340 views. Data as of Sep 26.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Very low reach: ERR ≈ 0.4% with 1 079 215 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: a post is seen by a negligible portion of the audience. Subscribers are present, but views are almost nonexistent.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 10: index 51, grade DJun 10Jun 29: index 15, grade FJun 29Sep 26: index 35, grade FSep 26

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 6,479 views versus 5,947 for regular posts — 9% higher.

Based on 4 advertising and 7 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 4 posts.

Questions about @kino_hd2

What is the risk level when buying ads in @kino_hd2?

The channel received a risk score of 65 out of 100 (red zone), and placement feasibility is rated as questionable due to the discrepancy between views and base metrics.

What is the actual reach that posts get on the channel?

With an audience of one million, the median is around 4.5 thousand views per post, which corresponds to reaching less than half a percent of the subscriber base.

Why is advertising placement considered questionable?

Views are inconsistent with the channel's overall metrics, about a third of posts are deleted, and the exact reach of an ad post is difficult to predict.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-26
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @kino_hd2 assessment dated 2026-09-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,079,215 subscribers, median post views were 4,466, ERR was 0.4%, and the cleanliness index was 35/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.