TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @c_u_t_l_e_t_t

Fake engagement check for @c_u_t_l_e_t_t

Котлеты — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-20.

https://t.me/Anarchy_starssbot?start=_tgr_akc4bdpmZjFi Звездочки

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-20
Subscribers
22
Median views
16
ERR
72.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Food & Cooking
Post language Russian
Channel age 1 year

Assessment summary

With a tiny audience of 22 subscribers, the channel shows a suspicious gap in metrics: sponsored posts get two and a half times more views than regular ones (median 32 vs. 13). Combined with the deletion of 58% of posts from the feed, this indicates targeted view boosting for specific posts, making ad purchases here questionable.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-20
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @c_u_t_l_e_t_t assessment dated 2026-09-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 22 subscribers, median post views were 16, ERR was 72.7%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Channel content

⚠️ Mixed content signals

Culinary texts and illustrations are generated using generic AI templates, and the feed also contains referral links to third-party bots.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 32 views versus 13 for regular posts — 146% higher.

Based on 8 advertising and 30 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 2 posts.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈58% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements to conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is circumstantial (posts are also deleted during edits).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 18 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (16).

03673Jan 18: 30 viewsJan 20: 30 viewsJan 20: 38 viewsJan 31: 22 viewsFeb 4: 37 viewsFeb 11: 49 viewsFeb 14: 68 viewsFeb 14: 73 viewsFeb 22: 57 viewsMar 1: 55 viewsMar 8: 56 viewsMar 10: 68 viewsMar 27: 56 viewsApr 18: 52 viewsMay 18: 38 viewsJul 15: 32 viewsJul 23: 32 viewsJul 29: 17 viewsJul 30: 16 viewsAug 1: 19 viewsAug 2: 18 viewsAug 3: 15 viewsAug 9: 16 viewsAug 25: 12 viewsSep 2: 7 viewsSep 7: 5 viewsSep 8: 3 viewsSep 9: 5 viewsSep 10: 4 viewsSep 11: 4 viewsSep 12: 5 viewsSep 12: 5 viewsSep 13: 4 viewsSep 14: 3 viewsSep 15: 3 viewsSep 16: 3 viewsSep 17: 3 viewsSep 18: 3 viewsSep 19: 3 viewsSep 20: 2 views Jan 18Sep 20

Maximum: 73 views. Data as of Sep 20.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@c_u_t_l_e_t_t forwards posts from

Run a fresh check for @c_u_t_l_e_t_t

Data from 2026-09-20 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @c_u_t_l_e_t_t and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @c_u_t_l_e_t_t

Questions about @c_u_t_l_e_t_t

Is it worth buying ads in this channel?

Placement is considered questionable with a risk score of 50 out of 100. There are signs that post views are being artificially boosted.

What is the actual reach of the posts?

With 22 subscribers, a typical post gets around 16 views. At the same time, more than half of the posts (58%) are deleted after publication.

Why do ad views raise concerns?

Sponsored posts get 146% more views than regular content. Such a spike in reach on a micro-channel usually indicates artificial boosting of specific posts.

Similar channels in Food & Cooking

All channels in Food & Cooking

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @c_u_t_l_e_t_t