TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @kazanok1992

@kazanok1992: statistics and cleanliness index

Казанцева & Компания

Юмор и тёплое общение https://telega.in/?r=hFsbz7Uu

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
6,183
Median views
977
ERR
15.8%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk score confirms the absence of artificial boosting: the channel has open comments, a natural audience reaction, and an organic distribution of views (CV 0.29). However, advertising feasibility is questionable due to posting intensity: at 38.4 posts per day, an ad post is instantly pushed out of focus, failing to gain long-term reach.

An additional factor is the overall decline in activity — over three months, the median views decreased from 1,397 to 977 alongside a gradual loss of subscribers.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 13 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,179 to 14,170 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 10 of 13
@kazanok1992 15.8%
similar channels median 28.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 13
@kazanok1992 1.01
similar channels median 3.26

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (977).

07001.4KSep 7: 1,401 viewsSep 7: 1,337 viewsSep 7: 1,335 viewsSep 7: 1,338 viewsSep 7: 1,337 viewsSep 7: 1,344 viewsSep 7: 1,338 viewsSep 7: 1,337 viewsSep 7: 1,335 viewsSep 7: 1,316 viewsSep 7: 1,321 viewsSep 8: 1,223 viewsSep 8: 1,221 viewsSep 8: 1,202 viewsSep 8: 1,192 viewsSep 8: 1,193 viewsSep 8: 1,208 viewsSep 8: 1,153 viewsSep 8: 1,151 viewsSep 8: 1,019 viewsSep 8: 930 viewsSep 8: 925 viewsSep 8: 924 viewsSep 8: 935 viewsSep 8: 935 viewsSep 8: 924 viewsSep 8: 861 viewsSep 8: 856 viewsSep 8: 851 viewsSep 8: 857 viewsSep 8: 856 viewsSep 8: 644 viewsSep 8: 643 viewsSep 8: 643 viewsSep 8: 624 viewsSep 8: 606 viewsSep 8: 520 viewsSep 8: 515 viewsSep 8: 511 viewsSep 8: 516 views Sep 7Sep 8
  • post views
  • 39 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 977

Maximum: 1,401 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 90, grade AJun 11Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 855–1,317 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @kazanok1992

Was artificial boosting detected on the channel?

No, the risk score is 0 out of 100, with open comments and natural reaction levels.

Why is placing an ad considered questionable?

Due to a publishing frequency of about 38 posts per day, the promotional content quickly drops down the feed and loses audience attention.

What is the trend for reach and audience?

Over 88 days, the audience decreased from 6,373 to 6,183 subscribers, and the median views dropped from 1,397 to 977.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @kazanok1992 assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,183 subscribers, median post views were 977, ERR was 15.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.